Bolanos-Nunez v. USA

Filing 31

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Willett's R&R (Doc. 30 ) is accepted. Petitioner's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Doc. 9 ) is dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Hearing and Dismiss (Doc. [2 9]) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and the Motion to Vacate (Doc. 24 ) in CR-12-00199-PHX-GMS and enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/23/15.(KGM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Oscar Bolanos-Nunez, Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 No. CV-13-01088-PHX-GMS No. CR-12-00199-PHX-GMS USA, ORDER 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside 17 or Correct Sentence, Motion to Dismiss and United States Magistrate Judge Eileen S. 18 Willett’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). 19 recommends that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss and dismiss the Amended 20 Motion to Vacate with prejudice. Doc. 30 at 3. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties 21 that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely 22 objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 3 23 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 24 2003)). Docs. 9, 29, 30. The R&R 25 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 26 review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 27 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 28 not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 1 determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 2 objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well- 3 taken. The Court will accept the R&R and grant the Motion to Dismiss and dismiss the 4 Motion to Vacate with prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court 5 “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations 6 made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, 7 or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to 8 the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 9 IT IS ORDERED: 10 1. Magistrate Judge Willett’s R&R (Doc. 30) is accepted. 11 2. Petitioner’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 12 (Doc. 9) is dismissed with prejudice. 13 3. Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Hearing and Dismiss (Doc. 29) is granted. 14 4. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and the Motion to Vacate 15 16 (Doc. 24) in CR-12-00199-PHX-GMS and enter judgment accordingly. 5. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the 17 event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability 18 because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See 19 Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 20 Dated this 23rd day of June, 2015. 21 22 23 Honorable G. Murray Snow United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?