Corral v. Mora

Filing 10

ORDER that the Complaint 1 and this action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/23/13. (TLJ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Gabriel Canales Corral, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. Detention Officer Mora, Defendant. 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-13-01295-PHX-GMS (SPL) ORDER 15 On June 26, 2013, Plaintiff Gabriel Corral, who is confined in the Maricopa 16 County Lower Buckeye Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 17 1983 (Doc. 1). In his one-count Complaint, Plaintiff sues Detention Officer Mora. In an 18 Order filed on August 15, 2013 (Doc. 6), the Court dismissed the Complaint for failure to 19 state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On September 9, 2013, Plaintiff was 20 granted 60 days to either voluntarily dismiss this case or file a first amended complaint. 21 (Doc. 9.) 22 On October 23, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 23 complaint in Corral v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, et al., CV-13-00054-PHX-GMS 24 (SPL), adding Defendant Mora as a defendant in that case. For purposes of judicial 25 economy, no further action by Plaintiff shall be required, and this action shall be 26 dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint (Doc. 1) and this action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Dated this 23rd day of October, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?