Montoya v. Seag et al
Filing
20
ORDER REJECTING 17 Report and Recommendation and denying 19 Motion to Re-Serve Defendant. The Clerk shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/2/14. (LSP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Joey Frank Montoya,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-13-01491-PHX-ROS
Unknown Saeg, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
On April 8, 2014, Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf issued a Report and
16
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this case be dismissed without prejudice
17
based on Plaintiff’s failure to complete service. (Doc. 17). Instead of objecting to the
18
R&R, Plaintiff filed a motion asking the marshals be instructed to attempt service again.
19
(Doc. 19). Normally, the Court would grant Plaintiff’s request and attempt to complete
20
service. However, in another case also filed by Plaintiff, the Court received notice that
21
Plaintiff’s mailing address is no longer valid. (Doc. 21 in CV-13-1575). Based on that
22
notice, it would be futile to take any further action in this case. See Carey v. King, 856
23
F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (“An order to show cause why dismissal was not
24
warranted or an order imposing sanctions would only find itself taking a round trip tour
25
through the United States mail.”). Therefore, the R&R will be rejected and the motion
26
requesting service will be denied. But pursuant to Rule 41(b), this case will be dismissed
27
based on Plaintiff’s failure to keep his address updated.
28
Accordingly,
1
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is REJECTED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion to Re-Serve Defendant (Doc. 19) is
3
4
5
6
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal
without prejudice.
Dated this 2nd day of September, 2014.
7
8
9
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?