Notali v. Colvin

Filing 38

ORDER granting 36 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 11/30/15.(KGM)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of the) ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) Evleen Notali, CIV 13-1766-PHX-MHB ORDER 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 16 on appeal (Doc. 36). Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a 17 party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to file a motion in district court, 18 attaching an affidavit that: “(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix 19 of Forms the party’s inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims an 20 entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.” 21 Plaintiff has complied with these requirements. The Court finds that Plaintiff has made 22 sufficient showing that she cannot pay the fees and costs associated with her appeal. 23 Accordingly, 24 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 25 26 27 28 on appeal (Doc. 36). DATED this 30th day of November, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?