Francois v. Beers et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying 33 Motion for Reconsideration. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/20/2014.(LMR)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sabina Carol Francois, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. Jeh Johnson, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 13-01964-PHX-PGR ORDER 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33) of the Court’s 16 order denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting 17 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s motion is not based on a showing of manifest error 18 or new facts or legal authority. LRCiv. 7.2(g). Instead, it repeats facts and arguments the 19 Court has already considered, twice. See United States v. Rezzonico, 32 F.Supp.2d 1112, 20 1116 (D.Ariz. 1998) (motions for reconsideration should not ask the court to “rethink what 21 the court has already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”). 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33). 24 DATED this 20th day of May, 2014. 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?