Francois v. Beers et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying 33 Motion for Reconsideration. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/20/2014.(LMR)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Sabina Carol Francois,

10
11
12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.
Jeh Johnson, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CV 13-01964-PHX-PGR

ORDER

14
15

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33) of the Court’s

16

order denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting

17

Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s motion is not based on a showing of manifest error

18

or new facts or legal authority. LRCiv. 7.2(g). Instead, it repeats facts and arguments the

19

Court has already considered, twice. See United States v. Rezzonico, 32 F.Supp.2d 1112,

20

1116 (D.Ariz. 1998) (motions for reconsideration should not ask the court to “rethink what

21

the court has already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”).

22

Accordingly,

23

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33).

24

DATED this 20th day of May, 2014.

25
26
27
28