Schad v. Brewer et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 25 Plaintiffs' Request for Clarification. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O. Silver on 10/7/2013.(ROS, kb)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Edward Harold Schad, Jr. and Robert Glen Jones, Jr., 10 Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 13 Janice K. Brewer, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-13-2001-PHX-ROS DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER 16 17 Plaintiffs have filed a Request for Clarification from Defendants (Doc. 25). Because 18 they “believe” that Defendants Notice of Disclosure (Doc. 24) “may be faulty or inaccurate,” 19 Plaintiffs ask the Court to direct Defendants to provide photographs of the drug labels to 20 confirm that Defendants’ statements are true. They also request that Defendants be required 21 to specify whether the pentobarbital to be used in Plaintiffs’ executions is Nembutal®. The 22 Request is denied. 23 In compliance with the Court’s order, Defendants disclosure provided the specific 24 drug-information Plaintiffs requested. Although it was not supported by an affidavit, any 25 false statement in the disclosure would constitute a Rule 11 violation. Plaintiffs’ conjecture 26 and disbelief is therefore an insufficient reason to grant them additional injunctive relief. 27 28 1 2 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification from Defendants (Doc. 25). DATED this 7th day of October, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 Roslyn O. Silver Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?