Schad v. Brewer et al
Filing
28
ORDER denying 25 Plaintiffs' Request for Clarification. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O. Silver on 10/7/2013.(ROS, kb)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Edward Harold Schad, Jr. and
Robert Glen Jones, Jr.,
10
Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
12
13
Janice K. Brewer, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-13-2001-PHX-ROS
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER
16
17
Plaintiffs have filed a Request for Clarification from Defendants (Doc. 25). Because
18
they “believe” that Defendants Notice of Disclosure (Doc. 24) “may be faulty or inaccurate,”
19
Plaintiffs ask the Court to direct Defendants to provide photographs of the drug labels to
20
confirm that Defendants’ statements are true. They also request that Defendants be required
21
to specify whether the pentobarbital to be used in Plaintiffs’ executions is Nembutal®. The
22
Request is denied.
23
In compliance with the Court’s order, Defendants disclosure provided the specific
24
drug-information Plaintiffs requested. Although it was not supported by an affidavit, any
25
false statement in the disclosure would constitute a Rule 11 violation. Plaintiffs’ conjecture
26
and disbelief is therefore an insufficient reason to grant them additional injunctive relief.
27
28
1
2
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification from
Defendants (Doc. 25).
DATED this 7th day of October, 2013.
4
5
6
7
8
Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?