Sarabia-Labrador v. USA

Filing 17

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, that Movant's Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 06/10/15. (ATD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 USA, Plantiff/Respondent, 10 CV-13-02193-PHX-JAT CR-12-00417-PHX-JAT ORDER 11 v. 12 Felipe Sarabia-Labrador, 13 Defendant/Movant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Movant’s Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 10). The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 16) recommending that this Court deny the Motion. 20 Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby 21 accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district 22 courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the 23 subject of an objection”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 24 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate 25 judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” 26 (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. 27 Ariz. 2003). 28 Accordingly, 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 10) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing 9 Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance 10 of a certificate of appealability because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the 11 denial of a constitutional right. 12 Dated this 10th day of June, 2015. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?