Hendricks v. Ryan et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16 ) is ACCEPTED; accordingly, Petitioner's Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 9 ) is denied and dismissed with prej udice, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of appealability is denied because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/2/2015. (KMG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Anthony Brenton Hendricks,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Charles L Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 13-2252-PHX-JAT
ORDER
15
16
Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas
17
Corpus (“Petition”) (Doc. 9). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation
18
(“R&R”) (Doc. 16) recommending that the Petition be denied.
19
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts
20
the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not
21
required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”
22
(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en
23
banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
24
findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis
25
in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
26
Based on the foregoing,
27
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16)
28
is ACCEPTED; accordingly,
1
•
2
3
Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 9) is
denied and dismissed with prejudice,
•
in the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of appealability
4
is denied because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural
5
ruling debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000),
6
and
7
•
the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice.
8
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2015.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?