Jackson v. Arpaio et al
Filing
10
ORDER, the First Amended Complaint 7 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further no tice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 9 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/7/14. (REW)
1
2
MD
WO
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Doarnell R. Jackson,
10
11
12
No. CV 13-2255-PHX-DGC (BSB)
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
On November 4, 2013, Plaintiff Doarnell R. Jackson, who is confined in the
16
Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a December 30,
18
2013 Order, the Court granted the Application to Proceed and dismissed the Complaint
19
because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file an
20
amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order.
21
On February 7, 2014, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7). On
22
February 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9). The
23
Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend. The Court will
24
deny the Motion without prejudice.
25
I.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
26
27
against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28
28
JDDL-K
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief
U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff
1
has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon
2
which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
3
immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
4
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
5
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8
6
does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-
7
defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”
8
(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
9
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678
10
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
11
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
12
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual
13
content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable
14
for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible
15
claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw
16
on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s
17
specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must
18
assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.
19
at 681.
20
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,
21
courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,
22
342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less
23
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.
24
Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).
25
26
facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal
27
of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The
28
JDDL-K
If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other
Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of
-2-
1
advice “would undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v.
2
Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to
3
decide whether the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff’s
4
First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it
5
may possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.
6
II.
First Amended Complaint
7
In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff sues Maricopa County, the Maricopa
8
County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”), Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, and
9
Detention Officers at the Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail.
Plaintiff seeks
10
compensatory and punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and an injunction requiring the
11
immediate discontinuation of strip searches of inmates being held in Maricopa County
12
detention facilities.
13
In Count I, Plaintiff alleges that his Fourteenth Amendment rights have been
14
violated and alleges the following facts: Defendant Arpaio instituted a policy “requiring
15
the strip search of all arrestees who are introduced into the Maricopa County [Fourth
16
Avenue] Jail for custodial housing.” This policy is carried out “without any suspicion of
17
possessing weapons or contraband upon entering the detention facilities as well as prior
18
to any and all court proceedings and hearings, solely for the reason(s) of being a detainee
19
of the Sheriff’s department and under the care of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio.” When
20
Plaintiff was arrested and detained, he was subject to a “‘blanket’ strip search” along with
21
all other inmates “regardless of misdemeanor or felony infraction.” The searches are
22
“excessive and harassing to pretrial detainees who have yet to be found guilty of crimes.”
23
According to Plaintiff, these searches constitute disparate treatment, violate inmates’
24
equal protection rights, and are “unrelated to any penological interests.” The searches
25
cause “physical, mental, emotional and psychological distress and instability.”
26
27
rights because Defendant Arpaio’s policy “invokes a (blanket) strip search of all
28
JDDL-K
In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that the strip searches violate his Fourth Amendment
arrestees, including minor/misdemeanor offenders awaiting bond without [] reasonable
-3-
1
suspicion of weapons or contraband.” The strip searches are also required “prior to any
2
court appearances and upon return, regardless of any reasonable suspicion of individual
3
necessity, but solely for the facility’s (blanket) strip search policy and requirement on the
4
behalf of Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department and under the authority of Sheriff
5
Joseph M. Arpaio.” Plaintiff asserts that the strip searches are thoroughly degrading,
6
frightening, and humiliating and cause psychological distress.
7
In Count III, Plaintiff alleges that the strip searches violate his Eighth Amendment
8
rights and that he has “been continuously strip searched solely for the reasons of being an
9
inmate and for being arrested.” “Strip searches of any pre-arraignment and pre-trial
10
detainee is not nor has it been supported by reasonable individualized suspicion and
11
placement in the general population by itself cannot justify a strip search.”
12
III.
Failure to State a Claim
13
To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the
14
conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of
15
state law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right.
16
Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). A plaintiff must also allege that
17
he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he
18
must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant.
19
Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).
20
21
Plaintiff sues MCSO; however, MCSO is not a proper defendant. Claims under
22
§ 1983 are directed at “bodies politic and corporate.” Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436
23
U.S. 658, 688-89 (1978).
24
municipalities and other local government units to be included among those persons to
25
whom § 1983 applies. Id. at 689-690. In Arizona, the responsibility for operating jails
26
and caring for prisoners is placed by law upon the sheriff and the County. See Ariz. Rev.
27
Stat. §§ 11-251(8), 11-291(A), 11-441(A)(5), 31-101. MCSO is simply an administrative
28
JDDL-K
A.
creation of the sheriff to allow him to carry out his statutory duties; it is not a “person”
MCSO
Under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Congress intended
-4-
1
amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. See, e.g., Petaway v. City of New Haven Police
2
Dep’t, 541 F. Supp. 2d 504 (D. Conn. 2008); Pahle v. Colebrookdale Twp., 227 F.
3
Supp. 2d 361 (E.D. Pa. 2002). Accordingly, MCSO will be dismissed from this action as
4
a Defendant.
5
B.
6
Plaintiff alleges no facts against any specific detention officer at the Maricopa
7
County Fourth Avenue Jail. Accordingly, Defendant Detention Officers at the Maricopa
8
County Fourth Avenue Jail will be dismissed.
Detention Officers at the Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail
9
Moreover, Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a plaintiff
10
to include the names of the parties in the action. As a practical matter, it is impossible in
11
most instances for the United States Marshal or his designee to serve a summons and
12
complaint or amended complaint upon an anonymous defendant. The Ninth Circuit has
13
held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing of a complaint, the plaintiff should
14
be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants, unless it
15
is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that the complaint would be
16
dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir.
17
1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980)). Where the names
18
of individual defendants are unknown at the time a complaint is filed, a plaintiff may
19
refer to the individual unknown defendants as Defendant Jane (or John) Doe 1, John Doe
20
2, and so on, and allege facts to support how each particular Doe defendant violated the
21
plaintiff’s constitutional rights. A plaintiff may thereafter use the discovery process to
22
obtain the names of fictitiously named defendants whom he believes violated his
23
constitutional rights and seek leave to amend to name those defendants.
24
25
in which he should name as Defendants the person(s) who allegedly violated his
26
constitutional rights. If Plaintiff does not know the names of those person(s), Plaintiff
27
may refer to each such person by a fictitious name, e.g., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, and so
28
JDDL-K
As discussed herein, Plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint
on and allege facts to support how each defendant violated his constitutional rights. That
-5-
1
is, Plaintiff must allege when, where, and how any Doe defendant violated his
2
constitutional rights.
3
C.
4
Plaintiff alleges no facts against Defendant Maricopa County; therefore,
5
Maricopa County
Defendant Maricopa County will be dismissed.
6
D.
7
Plaintiff alleges in Count II that the strip searches at the Fourth Avenue Jail violate
8
his rights under the Fourth Amendment. Detainees, like convicted prisoners, do not
9
possess “the full range of freedoms of an unincarcerated individual.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441
10
U.S. 520, 546 (1979). The applicability of the Fourth Amendment turns on whether the
11
person invoking its protection can claim a “justifiable,” a “reasonable,” or a “legitimate
12
expectation of privacy” that has been “invaded by government action.”
13
Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525 (1984) (quotation omitted); see also Bell, 441 U.S. at 557
14
(“any reasonable expectation of privacy that a detainee retained necessarily would be of a
15
diminished scope”). “A right of privacy in traditional Fourth Amendment terms is
16
fundamentally incompatible with the close and continual surveillance of inmates and
17
their cells required to ensure institutional security and internal order.” Id. at 527-28.
18
Furthermore, any restriction on a plaintiff’s privacy interests is justified to the extent that
19
it is “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” See Turner v. Safley, 482
20
U.S. 78, 89 (1987). The investigation and prevention of illegal inmate activity, including
21
the prevention of contraband and circulation of threats, is a legitimate penological
22
objective. See Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 411-12 (1989).
Fourth Amendment
Hudson v.
23
24
See Michenfelder v. Sumner, 860 F.2d 328, 322-33 (9th Cir. 1988). Whether a search is
25
reasonable under the Fourth Amendment requires a case-by-case “balancing of the need
26
for the particular search against the invasion of personal rights that the search entails
27
. . . .” Bell, 441 U.S. at 559. “The required factors for courts to consider include: (1) the
28
JDDL-K
Generally, strip searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of prisoners.
scope of the particular intrusion, (2) the manner in which it is conducted, (3) the
-6-
1
justification for initiating it, and (4) the place in which it is conducted.”
2
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Dept., 629 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 2011) (quotations
3
omitted).
Byrd v.
4
At the same time, the Fourth Amendment does guarantee the right of the people to
5
be secure against unreasonable searches, and its protections are not extinguished upon
6
incarceration. Michenfelder, 860 F.2d at 332-33. Further, the Fourth Amendment has
7
been held to apply to the invasion of bodily privacy. Id. at 332. Thus, strip searches that
8
are excessive, vindictive, harassing, or unrelated to any legitimate penological interest
9
may violate the Fourth Amendment. Id. A policy of routinely strip searching arrestees
10
for contraband has been held not to be unreasonable where there is no physical contact
11
and the searches are professionally conducted in relative privacy. Bull v. City and County
12
of San Francisco, 595 F.3d 964, 973 (9th Cir. 2010). Moreover, an arrestee can be “strip
13
searched without individualized suspicion if the arrestee would be introduced into the
14
general jail population.” Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco, 599 F.3d 946, 957
15
(9th Cir. 2010) (citing Bull, 595 F.3d at 977).
16
“reasonable suspicion to strip search arrestees charged with minor offenses who are not
17
classified for housing in the general population.” Id. Finally, the Supreme Court upheld
18
as constitutional strip searches of arrestees, which were conducted by county jails as a
19
standard part of the intake process and required male prisoners to lift their genitals and
20
cough in a squatting position, because the searches were “designed to uncover contraband
21
that can be undetected by a patdown, metal detector, and other less invasive searches.”
22
Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington, 132 S. Ct. 1510, 1520
23
(2012).
However, jail officials must have
24
25
Plaintiff fails to allege any specific facts about the strip searches at the Fourth Avenue
26
Jail, such as when he was strip searched, by whom, where, or any facts to support that the
27
search or searches were excessive, vindictive, harassing, or unrelated to a legitimate
28
JDDL-K
In this case, Plaintiff’s allegations are too vague and conclusory to state a claim.
penological interest. Plaintiff does not allege facts to support that there was any physical
-7-
1
contact or that the searches were unprofessionally conducted or not conducted in relative
2
privacy. Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S.
3
519, 520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action.
4
Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further,
5
a liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the
6
claim that were not initially pled. Id. In short, Plaintiff fails to allege sufficient facts to
7
state a Fourth Amendment claim, and Count II will be dismissed.
8
E.
9
Plaintiff alleges in Count I that the strip searches violate his Fourteenth
10
Amendment rights. Under the Due Process Clause, “a detainee may not be punished
11
prior to an adjudication of guilt.” Bell, 441 U.S. at 536 (citations omitted). However, the
12
government may subject a pretrial detainee “to the restrictions and conditions of the
13
detention facility so long as those conditions and restrictions do not amount to
14
punishment, or otherwise violate the Constitution.” Id. Here, Plaintiff has failed to
15
allege facts to support that the strip searches are conducted with the intent to punish
16
pretrial detainees. Bell, 441 U.S. at 540 (no unconstitutional punishment occurs when the
17
government imposes restrictions as part of legitimate operational concerns to ensure
18
security and order).
Fourteenth Amendment
19
20
violated. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that a state
21
may not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,”
22
which is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike.
23
U.S. Const., amend. XIV; see City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S.
24
432, 439 (1985).
25
discriminates against a suspect class of individuals is subject to strict scrutiny.
26
Massachusetts Bd. of Ret. v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 (1976); see City of Cleburne, 473
27
U.S. at 441.
28
JDDL-K
Plaintiff also alleges that his rights under the Equal Protection Clause have been
fundamental right has been violated, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that he has
A state practice that interferes with a fundamental right or that
Absent allegations that he is a member of a suspect class, or that a
-8-
1
been intentionally treated differently from others who are similarly situated without a
2
reasonable basis therefor. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564
3
(2000). Conclusory allegations do not suffice. See Village of Arlington Heights v.
4
Metropolitan Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 265 (1977). Plaintiff does not allege that
5
he is a member of a suspect class or that he has been treated differently from other
6
similarly situated individuals.
7
8
9
10
Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim and Count I
will be dismissed.
F.
Eighth Amendment
Plaintiff alleges in Count III that his Eight Amendment right to be free from cruel
11
and unusual punishment has been violated.
12
unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises from the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due
13
Process Clause rather than from the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and
14
unusual punishment. Bell, 441 U.S. 520 (1979). Nevertheless, the same standards apply,
15
requiring proof that the defendant acted with deliberate indifference. See Frost v. Agnos,
16
152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998).
A pretrial detainee’s claim for
17
18
allege that a defendant’s acts or omissions have deprived the inmate of “the minimal
19
civilized measure of life’s necessities” and that the defendant acted with deliberate
20
indifference to an excessive risk to inmate health or safety. Allen v. Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082,
21
1087 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834); see Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-
22
Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002). Whether conditions of confinement rise
23
to the level of a constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the duration of an
24
inmate’s exposure to those conditions. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089, 1091 (9th
25
Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978)). “The circumstances,
26
nature, and duration of a deprivation of [] necessities must be considered in determining
27
whether a constitutional violation has occurred.” Hearns v. Terhune, 413 F.3d 1036,
28
JDDL-K
To state a claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement, a plaintiff must
1042 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2000)).
-9-
1
Thus, for example, to state a claim regarding personal security, the detainee must show
2
that the defendant was deliberately indifferent. Redman v. County of Los Angeles, 942
3
F.2d 1435, 1443 (9th Cir. 1991) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1074 (1992). To
4
adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that a
5
defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate safety. Farmer, 511 U.S.
6
at 832-33. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the
7
inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must
8
also [have] draw[n] the inference.” Id.
9
Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts supporting that any Defendant was
10
deliberately indifferent to an excessive risk to his health or safety. Accordingly, Count
11
III will be dismissed.
12
IV.
Leave to Amend
13
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed
14
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff
15
may submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The
16
Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second
17
amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may
18
strike the second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to
19
Plaintiff.
20
Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second
21
Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in
22
its entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original
23
Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one
24
claim per count.
25
26
Amended Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal
27
Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After
28
JDDL-K
A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First
amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as
- 10 -
1
nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the
2
original complaint or first amended complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was
3
dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint.
4
Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).
5
V.
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
6
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction asks the court to enjoin Defendants
7
“from enforcing ‘unconstitutional’ jail policies to the petitioner, as well as all others
8
similarly situated . . . being the actual act of ‘blank strip searching’ all detainees housed
9
at Maricopa County(s) [Fourth Avenue] Jail(s) without any reasonable suspicion of
10
containing weapons or drugs.”
11
A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy and will not be
12
granted absent a clear showing of likely success in the underlying claim and possible
13
irreparable injury. See Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997) (per curiam).
14
An injunction or temporary restraining order is appropriate to grant intermediate relief of
15
the same character as which may be granted finally, and relief is not proper when
16
requested on matters lying wholly outside the issues in suit. See DeBeers Consol. Mines
17
v. United States., 325 U.S. 212, 220 (1945); Kaimowitz v. Orlando, Fla., 122 F.3d 41, 43
18
(11th Cir.), amended, 131 F.3d 950 (11th Cir. 1997). To obtain injunctive relief, the
19
party “must necessarily establish a relationship between the injury claimed in the party’s
20
motion and the conduct asserted in the complaint.” Devose v. Herrington, 42 F.3d 470,
21
471 (8th Cir. 1994). In other words, Plaintiff must seek injunctive relief related to the
22
merits of his underlying claim. Because Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint has been
23
dismissed, there are currently no claims pending before this Court.
24
25
“specific facts in an affidavit or verified complaint clearly show that immediate and
26
irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can
27
be heard” and the movant certifies to the court in writing any efforts made to give notice
28
JDDL-K
In addition, a temporary restraining order without notice may be granted only if
and the reasons that notice should not be required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). A “court
- 11 -
1
may only issue a preliminary injunction on notice to the adverse party.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
2
65(a)(1). Plaintiff has not provided notice nor does he explain why notice should not be
3
required. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s Motion will be denied without prejudice.
4
VI.
Warnings
5
A.
6
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his
7
release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he
8
intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to
9
comply may result in dismissal of this action.
Release
10
B.
11
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with
12
Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion
13
for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in
14
dismissal of this action.
Address Changes
15
C.
16
Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
17
LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further
18
notice to Plaintiff.
Copies
19
D.
20
Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a
21
claim, if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies
22
identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes”
23
provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring
24
a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the
25
prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,
26
brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the
27
grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
Possible “Strike”
28
JDDL-K
- 12 -
1
granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28
2
U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3
E.
4
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including
5
these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963
6
F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any
7
order of the Court).
8
IT IS ORDERED:
9
(1)
Possible Dismissal
The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is dismissed for failure to state a
10
claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended
11
complaint in compliance with this Order.
12
(2)
If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the
13
Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action
14
with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.
15
§ 1915(g).
16
(3)
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is denied without
prejudice.
(4)
The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a
civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 7th day of May, 2014.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
- 13 -
Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:
Revised 5/1/2013
1
Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119
Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010
7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2
12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3
1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.
FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.
4
Name and Prisoner/Booking Number
Place of Confinement
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(Full Name of Plaintiff)
Plaintiff,
vs.
(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).
G
Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.
)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint
A. JURISDICTION
1.
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:
.
Institution/city where violation occurred:
.
Revised 5/1/2013
1
550/555
B. DEFENDANTS
1.
Name of first Defendant:
. The first Defendant is employed as:
at
.
(Position and Title)
2.
(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:
Name of second Defendant:
at
.
(Position and Title)
3.
(Institution)
Name of third Defendant:
. The third Defendant is employed as:
at
.
(Position and Title)
4.
(Institution)
Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)
. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)
If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.
C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.
Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?
2.
If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?
G Yes
G No
. Describe the previous lawsuits:
a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.
2
D. CAUSE OF ACTION
1.
COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3
1.
COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4
1.
COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.
5
E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:
.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF
(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)
(Signature of attorney, if any)
(Attorney’s address & telephone number)
ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?