Williams v. Arizona, State of et al

Filing 72

ORDER that 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Expert is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/28/2014.(TLB)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Javon Tamar Williams,

10
11
12
13

No. CV 13-2306-PHX-RCB (MHB)

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

State of Arizona, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

On November 12, 2013, Plaintiff Javon Tamar Williams, who was confined in the

16

Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint and an

17

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an Order dated January 13, 2014, the

18

Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal

19

Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court entered

20

Judgment that same day. On January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Re-open Case,

21

which he amended on January 21, 2014. Following that, Plaintiff filed nineteen other

22

Motions, many of which were incomprehensible, and ten “Notices.” In an Order dated

23

February 24, 2014, the Court denied the Motion to Re-open and all other motions, to the

24

extent any relief was requested in them.

25

On February 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed in this closed case an unsigned “Notice to

26

ORDER physician to Scientific Progress NOTE,” which the Clerk of Court docketed as a

27

Motion to Appoint Expert (Doc. 57). Plaintiff has also filed eighteen other “Notices”

28

1

(Doc. 52-56, Doc. 58-71). This case is closed and, therefore, the Court will deny the

2

Motion to Appoint Expert, to the extent any relief is requested therein.

3

Accordingly,

4

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Expert (Doc. 57) is denied.

5

DATED this 28th day of March, 2014.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-