Del Grande-Leyva v. Gonzalez

Filing 14

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION to Dismiss Case and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as moot. Objections are due within fourteen (14) days. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 1/7/14. (SJF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) David Gonzalez, United States Marshal for) ) the District of Arizona, ) ) Respondent. ) ) David Del Grande-Leyva, No. CV-13-2351-PHX-SRB (DKD) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 16 TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN R. BOLTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: 17 On October 15, 2013, Magistrate Judge Bowman issued a provisional arrest warrant, 18 ordering the arrest of David Del Grande-Leyva pursuant to an extradition agreement between 19 Mexico and the United States. He was detained pursuant to this warrant, and Magistrate 20 Judge Rateau ordered Mr. Del Grande’s continued detention pending the extradition hearing 21 scheduled for January 6, 2014. See 4:13-mj-05682. 22 On November 15, 2013, Mr. Del Grande filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 23 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his Petition, he alleged that (1) his provisional arrest was 24 not appropriate pursuant to the extradition agreement; and (2) there are special circumstances 25 entitling him to release pending further extradition proceedings (Doc. 1). On December 18, 26 2013, in his criminal case, the government filed a Motion to Dismiss, because the Republic 27 of Mexico had notified the government that the Mexican warrant had been quashed and that 28 Mexico was rescinding their extradition request. On December 19, 2013, Magistrate Judge 1 Velasco granted the government’s Motion to Dismiss and released Mr. Del Grande. On 2 January 3, 2014, Mr. Del Grande, through counsel, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Habeas 3 Petition, contending that the petition is now moot. 4 5 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that David Del Grande-Leyva’s Motion to Dismiss be granted (Doc. 13). IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as moot (Doc. 1). 8 This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth 9 Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of 10 Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. The 11 parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation 12 within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 13 Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen 14 days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure timely to file objections to the 15 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report 16 and Recommendation by the district court without further review. See United States v. 17 Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure timely to file objections to any 18 factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party’s right 19 to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the 20 Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 DATED this 7th day of January, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?