Thompson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al
Filing
6
ORDER - The Notice of Removal failing to sufficiently plead jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED that by December 23, 2013, Defendant shall file an amended noticeof removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be remanded for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/9/13. (TLB)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
William U. Thompson,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
13
14
Hartford Accident
Company,
and
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Indemnity)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 13-2437-PHX-JAT
ORDER
15
“Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every
16
case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th
17
Cir. 2003). In this case, the notice of removal fails to sufficiently plead jurisdiction. See 28
18
U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1); Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 80, 92-93 (2010) (discussing the
19
citizenship of a corporation).
20
Accordingly,
21
IT IS ORDERED that by December 23, 2013, Defendant shall file an amended notice
22
of removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be remanded
23
for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 9th day of December, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?