Young v. Ryan et al
Filing
24
ORDER the 23 Report and Recommendation is accepted. Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/20/2015. (LFIG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
James E. Young,
No. CV-13-02624-PHX-GMS
Petitioner,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
16
United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).
17
Docs. 1, 23. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition. Doc. 23 at 29. The
18
Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the
19
R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to
20
obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 30 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-
21
Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
22
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
23
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
24
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
25
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
26
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
27
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-
28
taken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
1
(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
2
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The
3
district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further
4
evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).
5
IT IS ORDERED:
6
1.
Magistrate Judge Aspey’s R&R (Doc. 23) is accepted.
7
2.
Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed.
8
3.
The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.
9
4.
Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the
10
event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability
11
because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See
12
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
13
Dated this 20th day of April, 2015.
14
15
16
Honorable G. Murray Snow
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?