Krzyzewski v. Arpaio

Filing 11

ORDER granting the 9 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in complianc e with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/10/14. (LAD)

1
2

MD

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Steve J. Krzyzewski, Jr.,

10
11
12

No. CV 14-0019-PHX-DGC (BSB)

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

Joe Arpaio, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On January 6, 2014, Plaintiff Steve Krzyzewski, Jr., who was formerly confined in

16

the Maricopa County Towers Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an Order

18

dated January 23, 2014, the Court denied the Application to Proceed because it was

19

incomplete and granted Plaintiff 30 days to either file a complete Application to Proceed

20

or pay the filing fees. On March 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address

21

indicating he is no longer in custody. On March 18, 2014, the Court issued an Order to

22

Show Cause directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or show good cause why he

23

cannot pay. On March 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

24

and Supporting Information” (Doc. 9).

25

The Court will grant the Motion to Proceed and will dismiss the Complaint with

26
27

....

28

JDDL-K

leave to amend.

....

1

I.

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

2

In his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff states that he is not

3

employed, has no cash or money in checking or savings accounts, and has no other

4

valuable property such as real estate, stocks, bonds, notes or automobiles. Plaintiff’s

5

Motion complies with the Order to Show Cause. The Court will, therefore, grant the

6

Motion and will consider the claims in Plaintiff’s Complaint.

7

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

8

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

9

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

10

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

11

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

12

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

13

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

14

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

15

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8

16

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-

17

defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

18

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

19

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

20

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

21

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

22

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual

23

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable

24

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible

25

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw

26

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s

27

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must

28

JDDL-K

-2-

1

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

2

at 681.

3

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

4

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

5

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less

6

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

7

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).

8

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other

9

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal

10

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).

11

Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may

12

possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.

13

III.

Complaint

14

Plaintiff names Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio as the only Defendant

15

in his Complaint. He seeks damages pursuant to Graves v. Arpaio and an order that

16

Arpaio “comply with the 1983 settlement and serve inmates 3 meals a day, increase

17

sanitary supplies, [and] post capacity limits in holding cells.”

18

Plaintiff asserts a threat to safety claim in Count One and alleges the following

19

facts: Plaintiff experienced “shoulder to shoulder contact” in the Fourth Avenue court

20

complex holding cell, the Towers Jail property holding cell, and the medical holding cell.

21

Inmates had to sit on the floor and were required to stand for long periods of time which

22

“leads to hostile environment due to insufficient seating.” This condition was “per policy

23

set forth by MCSO Sheriff Joe Arpaio et-al.” Plaintiff suffered “mental anguish and

24

stress” and a “threat to personal safety and health.”

25
26

following facts. Per Defendant Arpaio’s policy, toilets in the holding cells are not

27

sanitized on a regular basis, the faucet valves are inoperative, and mold grows on the

28

JDDL-K

In Count Two, Plaintiff asserts he was denied basic necessities and alleges the

walls and around the “toilet/sink combo.” Cells are not cleaned or sanitized prior to the

-3-

1

arrival of inmates and there was a lack of cleaning supplies. One rag was provided to

2

clean and sanitize all the surfaces in the cells and there were no trash bags during lock

3

down. As a result, Plaintiff suffered the threat of staph infections and his health was at

4

risk, causing undo stress.

5

IV.

Failure to State a Claim

6

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

7

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

8

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

9

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

10

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

11

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

12

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

13

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

14
15

Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to judgment entered in Graves v. Arpaio, CV 77-

16

00479-PHX-NVW, formerly Hart v. Hill (D. Ariz.). However, Plaintiff may not enforce

17

the decrees entered in Graves in a separate civil rights action. See Cagle v. Sutherland,

18

334 F.3d 980, 986 (11th Cir. 2003); Klein v. Zavaras, 80 F.3d 432, 435 (10th Cir. 1996);

19

DeGidio v. Pung , 920 F.2d 525, 534 (8th Cir.1990); Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 1116,

20

1122-23 (5th Cir. 1986). Moreover, standing alone, remedial orders, such as those

21

entered in Graves, cannot serve as a substantive basis for a § 1983 claim for damages

22

because such orders do not create “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the

23

Constitution and laws.” Green, 788 F.3d at 1123-24. Rather, remedial decrees are the

24

means by which unconstitutional conditions are corrected.

25

reasons, Plaintiff may not properly seek § 1983 relief to enforce Graves in this action and

26

he fails to state a claim to the extent that he seeks relief pursuant to Graves.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

A.

....

Graves v. Arpaio

-4-

Id. at 1123.

For these

1

B.

2

Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio. While Arpaio may be sued for

3

constitutional violations, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him. “A plaintiff must

4

allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved

5

in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th

6

Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege

7

that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v. County of

8

Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). Further, there is no

9

respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of

10

someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make him

11

liable. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor v.

12

List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (citation omitted).

13

individual capacity “is only liable for constitutional violations of his subordinates if the

14

supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed

15

to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045.

Arpaio

A supervisor in his

16
17

rights. Moreover, Plaintiff does not allege facts to support that Plaintiff’s constitutional

18

rights were violated as a result of a specific policy or custom promulgated or endorsed by

19

Arpaio. Rather, Plaintiff makes the vague allegation that the conditions alleged in his

20

Complaint are “per policy set forth by Sheriff Joe Arpaio.” Although pro se pleadings

21

are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), conclusory and

22

vague allegations will not support a cause of action, Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of

23

Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a liberal interpretation of a civil

24

rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially

25

pled. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Defendant Arpaio and he

26

will be dismissed.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

In this case, Plaintiff does not allege that Arpaio directly violated his constitutional

....

-5-

1

C.

2

Section 1983 provides a cause of action against persons acting under color of state

3

law who have violated rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and federal

4

law. 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see also Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188, 190 (9th Cir.

5

1995). Plaintiff has failed to allege any constitutional or federal-law violations.

Failure to Allege a Constitutional Violation

6

A pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises

7

from the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause rather than from the Eighth

8

Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S.

9

520, 535 and n.16 (1979). Nevertheless, the same standards are applied, requiring proof

10

that the defendant acted with deliberate indifference. See Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124,

11

1128 (9th Cir. 1998).

12

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary

13

due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 835 (1994). To

14

state a claim of deliberate indifference, plaintiffs must meet a two-part test. “First, the

15

alleged constitutional deprivation must be, objectively, sufficiently serious”; and the

16

“official’s act or omission must result in the denial of the minimal civilized measure of

17

life’s necessities.” Id. at 834 (internal quotations omitted). Second, the prison official

18

must have a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with “deliberate

19

indifference to inmate health or safety.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). In defining

20

“deliberate indifference” in this context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective

21

test: “the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn

22

that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at

23

837 (emphasis added).

24
25

construe his claims as raised pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment because he has

26

failed to allege facts showing that a specific, individually named Defendant was aware of

27

a serious risk of harm to Plaintiff and failed to act. Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to

28

JDDL-K

Even if Plaintiff had named proper Defendants, the Court would be unable to

state a claim in either of his grounds for relief.

-6-

1

V.

Leave to Amend

2

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to

3

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a

4

first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will

5

mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If

6

Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended

7

complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

8

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

9

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name

10

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to

11

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of

12

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of

13

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.

14

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If

15

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific

16

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for

17

failure to state a claim.

18

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be

19

dismissed.

Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of

20

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

21

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

22

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

23

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

24
25

963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896

26

F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original

27

complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised

28

JDDL-K

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without

-7-

1

prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa

2

County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

3

VI.

Warnings

4

A.

5

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with

6

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion

7

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in

8

dismissal of this action.

9

B.

Address Changes

Copies

10

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

11

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further

12

notice to Plaintiff.

13

C.

14

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff

15

fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

16

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

17

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

18

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

19

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal

20

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,

21

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner

22

is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Possible “Strike”

23
24

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

25

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

26

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

27

order of the Court).

28

JDDL-K

D.

....

Possible Dismissal

-8-

1
2

IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Supporting

3

Information” (Doc. 9) is granted. Plaintiff may continue this lawsuit in forma pauperis

4

and without paying the filing fee.

5

(2)

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff

6

has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in

7

compliance with this Order.

8

(3)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

9

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with

10

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

11
12
13

(4)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 10th day of June, 2014.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 5/1/2013

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 5/1/2013

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:

. The first Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
2.

(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:

Name of second Defendant:
at

.

(Position and Title)
3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:

. The third Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

6