Alarcon v. Pinal County Jail et al
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet): Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 is granted; Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $39.82; Count Two is dismissed without prejudice; Defendant Pinal County Jail is dismissed without prejudice; Defendant Aguire must answer Count One of the Complaint; The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint 1 , this Order, and both summons and request fo r waiver forms for Defendant Aguire; Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails t o comply with this Order; If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant Aguire within 120 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing o f this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(i); This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/9/2014. (See Order for details)(ALS)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Javier V. Alarcon,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. CV 14-00163-PHX-RCB (MHB)
vs.
ORDER
Pinal County Jail, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Javier V. Alarcon, who is confined in the Pinal County Adult Detention
16
Center, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1)
17
and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2).
18
Defendant Aguire to answer Count One of the Complaint and will dismiss Count Two
19
and Defendant Pinal County Jail without prejudice.
20
I.
The Court will order
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
21
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.
22
§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
23
The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $39.82. The remainder of the fee will
24
be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to
25
Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C.
26
§ 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government
27
agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula.
28
....
TERMPSREF
1
II.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
2
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief
3
against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28
4
U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff
5
has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon
6
which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
7
immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
8
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
9
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8
10
does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-
11
defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”
12
(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
13
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678
14
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
15
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
16
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual
17
content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable
18
for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible
19
claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw
20
on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s
21
specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must
22
assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.
23
at 681.
24
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,
25
courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,
26
342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less
27
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.
28
Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).
TERMPSREF
-2-
1
III.
2
3
Complaint
In his two-count Complaint, Plaintiff names as Defendants the Pinal County Jail
and Detention Officer Aguire.
4
In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that he was subjected to excessive force in
5
violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff asserts that while he was in the morning
6
medication line, Defendant Aguire made obscene gestures and sexual remarks to a “deaf-
7
mute” inmate, other inmates told Defendant Aguire to leave the inmate alone, and
8
Defendant Aguire became upset and began cursing at the inmates and calling them “sex
9
offenders.” Plaintiff claims that Defendant Aguire “suddenly turned his anger toward[]
10
[Plaintiff]” and began yelling at Plaintiff and calling him names. Plaintiff states that
11
when he requested that Defendant Aguire stop disrespecting him, Defendant Aguire got
12
angry and told Plaintiff to “cuff up.” Plaintiff alleges that he complied with Defendant
13
Aguire’s request.
14
Plaintiff asserts that after he was restrained, Defendant Aguire said, “Do you want
15
to see what I do to people like you,” and then proceeded to slam Plaintiff, face-first, into
16
a metal door, then into a wall, and then into the glass window of the control room.
17
Plaintiff claims Defendant Aguire kept Plaintiff pinned to the window for 10-15 minutes,
18
during which time he used “excessive force to the back of [Plaintiff’s] neck” and
19
smashed Plaintiff’s face into the window.
20
threatened Plaintiff with additional harm, told Plaintiff what time Defendant Aguire got
21
off work, and told him that there were no cameras outside the control room, so no one
22
would find about the altercation or believe Plaintiff.
23
24
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Aguire
Plaintiff alleges that he suffered mental injuries and physical injuries to his head,
eye, and foot.
25
In Count Two, Plaintiff alleges that he was subjected to negligence and deliberate
26
indifference, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, because “Pinal County Official[]s”
27
failed to intervene when Defendant Aguire was using excessive force.
28
....
TERMPSREF
-3-
1
IV.
Claim for Which an Answer Will be Required
2
The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause, not the Eighth Amendment,
3
protects pretrial detainees from excessive force that amounts to punishment. Gibson v.
4
County of Washoe, 290 F.3d 1175, 1197 (9th Cir. 2002). Liberally construed, Plaintiff
5
has stated an excessive force claim again Defendant Aguire. The Court will require
6
Defendant Aguire to answer Count One of the Complaint.
7
V.
Failure to State a Claim
8
Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,
9
520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey
10
v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a
11
liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the
12
claim that were not initially pled. Id.
13
A.
14
Defendant Pinal County Jail is not a proper Defendant. Section 1983 imposes
15
liability on any “person” who violates an individual’s federal rights while acting under
16
color of state law. Defendant Pinal County Jail is a building or collection of buildings,
17
not a person or legally created entity capable of being sued. Therefore, the Court will
18
dismiss Defendant Pinal County Jail.
Defendant Pinal County Jail
19
B.
20
Officials can be held liable for failing to intercede when their fellow officers
21
violate constitutional rights only when they have a reasonable opportunity to intercede.
22
See Cunningham v. Gates, 229 F.3d 1271, 1289-90 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Yang v.
23
Hardin, 37 F.3d 282, 285 (7th Cir. 1994). Plaintiff does not identify any “Pinal County
24
Official” who was present during Plaintiff’s altercation with Defendant Aguire, had a
25
reasonable opportunity to intercede, and failed to do so. Plaintiff’s allegations are too
26
vague and conclusory to state a claim. Thus, the Court will dismiss without prejudice
27
Count Two.
28
....
TERMPSREF
Count Two
-4-
1
VI.
Warnings
2
A.
3
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his
4
release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he
5
intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to
6
comply may result in dismissal of this action.
Release
7
B.
8
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with
9
Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion
10
for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in
11
dismissal of this action.
Address Changes
12
C.
13
Plaintiff must serve Defendant, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a
14
copy of every document that he files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include a
15
certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Also,
16
Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See LRCiv
17
5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to
18
Plaintiff.
19
D.
20
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including
21
these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v.
22
Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action
23
for failure to comply with any order of the Court).
24
IT IS ORDERED:
Copies
Possible Dismissal
25
(1)
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.
26
(2)
As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government
27
agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing
28
fee of $39.82.
TERMPSREF
-5-
1
(3)
Count Two is dismissed without prejudice.
2
(4)
Defendant Pinal County Jail is dismissed without prejudice.
3
(5)
Defendant Aguire must answer Count One of the Complaint.
4
(6)
The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the
5
Complaint (Doc. 1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for
6
Defendant Aguire.
7
(7)
Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court
8
within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not
9
provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.
10
(8)
If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or
11
complete service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant Aguire within 120 days
12
of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is
13
later, the action may be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(i).
14
15
(9)
The United States Marshal must retain the Summons, a copy of the
Complaint, and a copy of this Order for future use.
16
(10)
The United States Marshal must notify Defendant of the commencement of
17
this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the
18
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice to Defendant must include a copy of this
19
Order.
20
summons. If a waiver of service of summons is returned as undeliverable or is not
21
returned by Defendant within 30 days from the date the request for waiver was sent
22
by the Marshal, the Marshal must:
The Marshal must immediately file signed waivers of service of the
23
(a)
personally serve copies of the Summons, Complaint, and this Order
24
upon Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
25
and
26
(b)
within 10 days after personal service is effected, file the return of
27
service for Defendant, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of
28
service of the summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service
TERMPSREF
-6-
1
upon Defendant. The costs of service must be enumerated on the return of service
2
form (USM-285) and must include the costs incurred by the Marshal for
3
photocopying additional copies of the Summons, Complaint, or this Order and for
4
preparing new process receipt and return forms (USM-285), if required. Costs of
5
service will be taxed against the personally served Defendant pursuant to Rule
6
4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise ordered by the
7
Court.
8
(11)
9
10
11
If Defendant agrees to waive service of the Summons and Complaint,
he must return the signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, not the
Plaintiff.
(12)
Defendant must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate
12
motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal
13
Rules of Civil Procedure.
14
(13)
This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to
15
Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as
16
authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
17
DATED this 9th day of May, 2014.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TERMPSREF
-7-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?