Florence v. Unknown Party et al

Filing 10

ORDER: The First Amended Complaint 8 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/26/2014. (ALS)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Alexander Napier Florence,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

No. CV 14-0195-PHX-RCB (BSB)

vs.

ORDER

John Doe #1, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On February 3, 2014, Plaintiff Alexander Napier Florence, who is confined in the

16

Arizona State Prison Complex-Lewis (“ASPC-Lewis”), filed a pro se civil rights

17

Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma

18

Pauperis. In a May 9, 2014 Order, the Court granted the Application to Proceed and

19

dismissed the Complaint because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. The Court gave

20

Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the

21

Order.

22

On June 11, 2014, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (Doc. 8). The

23

Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend.

24

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

25
26

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

27

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

28

JDDL-K

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

1

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

2

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

3

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

4

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). While Rule 8 does not demand

5

detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

6

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

7

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

8

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).

9

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

10

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff

11

pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the

12

defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint

13

states a plausible claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the

14

reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus,

15

although a plaintiff’s specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional

16

claim, a court must assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a

17

defendant’s conduct. Id. at 681.

18
19

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

20

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less

21

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

22

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). If the Court determines that a pleading

23

could be cured by the allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an

24

opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203

25

F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will

26

be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may possibly be amended to state

27

a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.

28

JDDL-K

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

....

-2-

1

II.

First Amended Complaint

2

In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges one count and names the

3

following Defendants: Tucker, a physician’s assistant at ASPC-Lewis, Bachman Unit;

4

John Doe #1, “reviewing doctor/Corizon Healthcare” at ASPC-Lewis, Bachman Unit;

5

John Doe #2, “facilities health administrator” at ASPC-Lewis; and John Doe #3,

6

“deciding doctor/Corizon Healthcare” at ASPC-Lewis.

7

Plaintiff alleges that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated as follows: In

8

early 2013, Plaintiff was transferred to the Arizona Department of Corrections (“ADOC”)

9

from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”). From October 2012 to March

10

2013, while he was in MCSO custody, Plaintiff was “on chronic care medication and care

11

for his left wrist.” Plaintiff was transferred to ASPC-Lewis and began to submit health

12

needs requests (“HNRs”) requesting “medical care.”

13

delayed Plaintiff’s care several months. On August 12, 2013, Plaintiff was permitted to

14

see Dr. Schaub, an outside specialist at the Arizona Center for Hand Surgery. Dr. Schaub

15

was Plaintiff’s physician before he was incarcerated. Dr. Schaub “ordered physical

16

therapy, specific pain and nerve damage medication, and a follow-up appointment for

17

further surgery assessment.” These orders were not honored by Defendants. Plaintiff’s

18

condition “subsequently worsened” due to lack of care.

Defendant Tucker denied and

19

In October 2013, Plaintiff was transferred back to MCSO custody and received

20

medications and treatment for his wrist. Plaintiff’s surgery was “delayed by Dr. Schaub

21

until after his release due to lack of care and lack of ‘ADOC’ to provide proper

22

aftercare.” Dr. Schaub determined that Plaintiff’s condition cannot and will not improve

23

without surgery and will worsen.

24
25

was on medication and his medical records reflected the treatment and medications he

26

was on while in MCSO custody. Defendant Tucker reviewed Plaintiff’s medical records

27

from Plaintiff’s visits with Dr. Schaub on August 12, 2013 and December 21, 2013.

28

JDDL-K

In February 2014, Plaintiff was transferred back into “ADOC custody.” Plaintiff

Defendant Tucker then wrote a fictitious report to the reviewing committee. Defendant

-3-

1

John Doe #1 denied “all physical therapy, all medications, a wrist brace and any and all

2

medical treatment.”

3

history, knew that Defendant John Doe #1’s decision was incorrect, but concurred with

4

Defendant John Doe #1’s decision on March 26, 2014. Defendants John Doe #2 and

5

John Doe #3 “being of a supervisory pos[]ition are equally respon[si]ble for allowing

6

their subordinates to continue this behavior unchecked for so long.”

Defendant Tucker, who had knowledge of Plaintiff’s medical

7

Plaintiff was scheduled to see Defendant Tucker twice over the next four months,

8

but has still not been seen and is still receiving no care. Plaintiff has submitted thirty to

9

forty HNRs over a period of thirteen months and has not received any physical therapy,

10

medication, or any care.

11
12

Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief.
III.

Failure to State a Claim

13

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

14

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

15

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

16

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

17

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

18

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

19

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

20

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

21
22

violation of the Eighth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must

23

show that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.”

24

Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S.

25

97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating

26

that failure to treat the condition could result in further significant injury or the

27

unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was

28

JDDL-K

Moreover, not every claim relating to inadequate medical treatment states a

deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 (quotations omitted).

-4-

1

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d

2

1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must

3

both know of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be

4

aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious

5

harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

6

837 (1994).

7

purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and

8

harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may

9

also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies, delays, or interferes with

10

medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the prisoner’s medical needs.

11

Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

Deliberate indifference in the medical context may be shown by a

12

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary

13

due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor

14

gross negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of

15

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

16

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

17

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion

18

does not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.”

19

Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care,

20

without more, is insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate

21

indifference. See Shapley v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407

22

(9th Cir. 1985). The indifference must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of

23

“unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

24
25

Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Tucker are vague and conclusory and fail

26

to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Although pro se pleadings are liberally

27

construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague

28

JDDL-K

A.

allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of

Defendant Tucker

-5-

1

Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a liberal interpretation of a civil

2

rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially

3

pled. Id.

4

Although Plaintiff alleges that he was on chronic care medicine and care for his

5

wrist, Plaintiff never states the injury to his wrist, what type of pain he was experiencing,

6

what medications he was on, or what type of care was necessary to treat his wrist.

7

Moreover, Plaintiff does not state what problems he was having with his wrist on

8

individual occasions, whether he described his symptoms to Defendant Tucker, when he

9

saw Defendant Tucker for his symptoms, or any other facts demonstrating that Defendant

10

Tucker knew that Plaintiff had a serious medical need.

11

Defendant Tucker knew what was in Plaintiff’s medical records are too vague to show

12

that Defendant Tucker knew that Plaintiff had a serious medical need.

Plaintiff’s allegations that

13

Likewise, while Plaintiff makes conclusory statements that Defendant Tucker

14

removed Plaintiff from medications and care, Plaintiff does not state when Defendant

15

Tucker removed him from medications and care, what medications were discontinued,

16

what care was discontinued, whether Defendant Tucker offered any explanation for the

17

discontinuation of Plaintiff’s care and medication, or any other specific facts about

18

interactions Plaintiff had with Defendant Tucker to demonstrate that Defendant Tucker

19

knew that Plaintiff had a serious medical need and was deliberately indifferent to such

20

need. Likewise, Plaintiff does not state the contents of the fictitious report that Defendant

21

Tucker allegedly wrote about Plaintiff. Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim

22

upon which relief can be granted against Defendant Tucker and he will be dismissed.

23
24

The only allegation against John Doe #1 in Plaintiff’s complaint is that he “denied

25

all physical therapy, all medications, a wrist brace, and any and all medical treatment.”

26

Plaintiff does not allege facts demonstrating that John Doe #1 knew that Plaintiff had a

27

serious medical need. Plaintiff does not allege facts demonstrating how John Doe #1

28

JDDL-K

B.

knew that Plaintiff had a serious medical need, what John Doe #1 knew about Plaintiff’s

Defendant John Doe #1

-6-

1

serious medical need, or how John Doe #1 denied Plaintiff all treatment for his serious

2

medical need. Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be

3

granted against Defendant John Doe #1 in his Complaint and John Doe #1 will be

4

dismissed.

5

C.

6

Plaintiff’s sole allegation against John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 is that Defendant

7

John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 “being of a supervisory pos[]ition are equally respon[si]ble

8

for allowing their subordinates to continue this behavior unchecked for so long.” “A

9

plaintiff must allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was

10

personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152

11

F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a

12

plaintiff must allege that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See

13

Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted).

14

Further, there is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position

15

as the supervisor of someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights

16

does not make him liable. Monell v. N.Y. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978);

17

Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (citation omitted). A supervisor in his

18

individual capacity “is only liable for constitutional violations of his subordinates if the

19

supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed

20

to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045.

John Does #2 and #3

21
22

directly violated his constitutional rights. Moreover, Plaintiff does not allege facts to

23

support that Plaintiff’s constitutional rights were violated as a result of a policy or custom

24

promulgated or endorsed by John Doe #2 or John Doe #3. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to

25

state a claim upon which relief can be granted against John Doe #2 or John Doe #3 and

26

they will be dismissed.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

Plaintiff does not allege facts demonstrating that John Doe #2 or John Doe #3

....

-7-

1

IV.

Leave to Amend

2

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed

3

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff

4

may submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The

5

Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second

6

amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may

7

strike the second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to

8

Plaintiff.

9

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second

10

Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in

11

its entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

12

Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one

13

claim per count.

14

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

15

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name

16

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to

17

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of

18

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of

19

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.

20

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If

21

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific

22

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for

23

failure to state a claim.

24

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be

25

dismissed.

Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of

26
27

Amended Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal

28

JDDL-K

A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First

Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After

-8-

1

amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as

2

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the

3

original complaint or first amended complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was

4

dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint.

5

Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

6

V.

Warnings

7

A.

8

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his

9

release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he

10

intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to

11

comply may result in dismissal of this action.

Release

12

B.

13

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with

14

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion

15

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in

16

dismissal of this action.

Address Changes

17

C.

18

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

19

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further

20

notice to Plaintiff.

Copies

21
22

Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a

23

claim, if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies

24

identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes”

25

provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring

26

a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the

27

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,

28

JDDL-K

D.

brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the

Possible “Strike”

-9-

1

grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

2

granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28

3

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4

E.

5

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

6

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

7

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

8

order of the Court).

9

IT IS ORDERED:

10

(1)

Possible Dismissal

The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) is dismissed for failure to state a

11

claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended

12

complaint in compliance with this Order.

13

(2)

If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the

14

Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action

15

with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.

16

§ 1915(g).

17

(3)

18
19

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 26th day of June, 2014.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JDDL-K

- 10 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6