Ramirez v. Ryan et al

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 : IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is Denied and that this action is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued and that the petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find theruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/11/15. (LAD)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Cesar Ramirez Ramirez,

10

Petitioner,

No. CV-14-00196-PHX-PGR
ORDER

11
12
13
14

v.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.

15
16
17

The Court having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) of

18

Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade, filed on February 6, 2015, notwithstanding that no

19
20
21
22
23

party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation,
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
13) is accepted and adopted by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

24
25

for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is Denied and that this action is

26

dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

27
28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued

1
2

and that the petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis because dismissal of the
Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the

3
4
5

ruling debatable.
Dated this 11th day of May, 2015.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-