McGough et al v. Phoenix AZ Power Sweep Incorporated et al
Filing
8
ORDER, placing the claims alleged in this case against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. only on inactive status until 8/25/14 (180 days); the claims against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. may be dismissed without prejudice and further n otice on 8/25/14 as set forth in this order; any party may request the Court to schedule an informal status conference before the 180-day period expires to inform the Court what action, if any, has been undertaken in the Bankruptcy Court that would permit the claim(s) against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. to proceed (see order for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 3/11/14. (REW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Amy McGough; Joshua Reyes; and Monte)
)
McRae,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc., an)
Arizona corporation; and Todd Woods and)
)
Michelle Woods, husband and wife,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. CV-14-300-PHX-LOA
ORDER
16
The Court has received the Notice of Bankruptcy Filing, informing the Court and
17
other parties herein that Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc., has filed a Petition under
18
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
19
of Arizona, Case No. 2:14-bk-00386-SSC. (Doc. 7) By virtue of the automatic stay imposed
20
under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petition, all pending matters
21
against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. are, and will be, stayed until further order
22
of the Court. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); O’Donnell v. Vencor Inc., 466 F.3d. 1104 (9th Cir.
23
2006). Because the Bankruptcy Court’s automatic bankruptcy stay applies to only Defendant
24
Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc., the Court expects Plaintiffs to continue the prosecution of
25
this case against the other two defendants. If Plaintiffs desire a stay of this entire case
26
because the subject Bankruptcy Petition, they must move to do so promptly.
27
Accordingly,
28
IT IS ORDERED placing the claims alleged in this case against Defendant Phoenix
1
AZ Power Sweep, Inc. only on inactive status until August 25, 2014 (180 days).
2
The claims against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. may be dismissed
3
without prejudice and further notice on August 25, 2014 (180 days), pursuant to Rule 41(b)
4
(lack of prosecution) unless prior to the scheduled dismissal date Plaintiffs demonstrate they
5
have moved to lift the bankruptcy stay, but the request has not been ruled upon or has been
6
denied; have sought to reduce the claim(s) against the debtor to judgment in the Bankruptcy
7
Court in an adversary proceeding and the adversary proceeding has not yet been resolved
8
despite Plaintiffs’ due diligence in seeking such a resolution; obtained severance of the
9
claim(s) against the debtor from the claim(s) against the other parties to this action; or
10
demonstrated a reasonable basis for continuance of the claims alleged against Defendant
11
Phoenix AZ Power Sweep, Inc. on inactive status. See O’Donnell, 466 F.3d. at 1108
12
(“Although [t]he general rule is that actions taken in violation of an automatic stay are void,
13
the dismissal for failure to prosecute was not void because it did not constitute a continuation
14
of a judicial proceeding against the debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1).”).
15
Any party may request the Court to schedule an informal status conference before the
16
180-day period expires to inform the Court what action, if any, has been undertaken in the
17
Bankruptcy Court that would permit the claim(s) against Defendant Phoenix AZ Power
18
Sweep, Inc. to proceed.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to provide
20
a copy of this Order to Mr. Allan D. NewDelman, Attorney for Debtor/Defendant Phoenix
21
AZ Power Sweep, Inc.
22
Dated this 11th day of March, 2014.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?