Bottom Line Recoveries LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
Filing
22
ORDER that by May 7, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the complaint properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/22/2014. (KMG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Bottom Line Recoveries, LLC,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
Lockheed Martin Corp.,
13
Defendant.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 14-443-PHX-JAT
ORDER
15
16
“Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every
17
case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th
18
Cir. 2003). In this case, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1332; Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006)
20
(discussing the citizenship of a limited liability company); see also CV 08-692-PHX-JAT
21
(Doc. 13); CV 11-1831-PHX-JAT (Doc. 27); CV 11-2038-PHX-JAT (Doc. 11); CV 08-
22
1620-PHX-JAT (Doc. 17).
23
Accordingly,
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS ORDERED that by May 7, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the
2
complaint properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed
3
without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
4
DATED this 22nd day of April, 2014.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?