Loomis #206936 v. Ryan et al
Filing
22
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15 ) is ACCEPTED; accordingly; Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice; in the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of appealability is denied and; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/29/2016. (REK)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
John Charles Loomis,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-14-00445-PHX-JAT
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
Pending before this Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
16
(Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned issued a Report and
17
Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court deny the Petition and issuance of
18
a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 15).
19
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.1 Accordingly, the Court hereby
20
accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district
21
courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the
22
subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
23
1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review
24
the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but
25
not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d
26
1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
27
28
1
Petitioner received an extension of time to file his objections, but the extended
deadline has expired. (Doc. 21).
1
Based on the foregoing,
2
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
3
4
15) is ACCEPTED; accordingly,
$
5
6
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and
dismissed with prejudice,
$
7
in the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of
appealability is denied, and
8
$
9
Dated this 29th day of March, 2016.
the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?