Delgado v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al

Filing 6

ORDER : Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 4 is granted; Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $23.80; The Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a cla im. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order; If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a j udgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner; Plaintiff's "Motion to Amend" 3 is denied without prejudice; All future filings must be captioned: CV 14-0665-PHX-DGC (MHB); the Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/2014. (ALS)

1
2

ASH

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Anthony Delgado,

10
11
12
13

No. CV 14-0665-PHX-DGC (SPL)
Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER

Arizona Department of Corrections, et
al.,

14

Defendants.

15
Plaintiff Anthony Delgado, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex -

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JDDL-K

Yuma in San Luis, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 4).
Plaintiff has also filed a document titled “This is a Motion to Amend” (Doc. 3). The
Court will deny the Motion and will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.
I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $23.80. The remainder of the fee will
be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to
Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government
agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula.

1

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

2

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

3

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

4

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

5

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

6

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

7

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

8

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

9

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8

10

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-

11

defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

12

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

13

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

14

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

15

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

16

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual

17

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable

18

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible

19

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw

20

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s

21

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must

22

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

23

at 681.

24
25

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

26

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less

27

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

28

JDDL-K

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).

-2-

1

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other

2

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal

3

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).

4

Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may

5

possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.

6

III.

Complaint

7

In his two-count Complaint, Plaintiff names as Defendants the Arizona

8

Department of Corrections (“ADOC”); Kieth Smith, a security operations administrator

9

with ADOC; Marlene Coffy, a protective segregation officer with ADOC; and R.

10

Sanders, the warden at the Dakota Unit of Arizona State Prison Complex – Yuma.

11

In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that he has repeatedly requested protective custody

12

status due to threats and assaults made against him by other inmates. Rather than place

13

Plaintiff in protective custody, however, Defendants have moved Plaintiff from one

14

prison complex to another. Despite the moves, Plaintiff alleges that he is still in danger,

15

and that Defendants’ failure to place him in protective custody violates his right to be free

16

from physical harm and threats. As a result, Plaintiff alleges that he has suffered at least

17

one assault in which he was physically injured.

18

In Count Two, Plaintiff alleges that he filed a grievance related to Defendants’

19
20

presented as part of that grievance was lost by Defendant Sanders’ staff. Plaintiff alleges

21

that his family contacted Defendant Sanders regarding the loss of evidence, and that

22

Plaintiff’s Aunt even drove to Yuma and personally spoke with Defendant Sanders about

23

the grievance and loss of evidence.

24

Sanders cancelled the grievance, and placed Plaintiff in a general population unit. When

25

Plaintiff refused to go to the general population unit, he alleges that Defendant Sanders

26

had her staff seize Plaintiff’s personal property and revoke his privileges in retaliation for

27

the complaints Plaintiff and his family had made. As a result, Plaintiff alleges that he has

28

JDDL-K

failure to place him in protective custody.

suffered mental anguish, emotional damages, and anxiety attacks.

According to Plaintiff, the evidence he

Nevertheless, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant

-3-

1

For his alleged injuries, Plaintiff seeks monetary compensation and placement in

2

protective custody.

3

IV.

Failure to State a Claim

4

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

5

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

6

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

7

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

8

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

9

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

10

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

11

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

12

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,

13

520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey

14

v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a

15

liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the

16

claim that were not initially pled. Id.

17
18

The Arizona Department of Corrections is not a proper Defendant. Under the

19

Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, a state or state agency may

20

not be sued in federal court without its consent. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v.

21

Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989).

22

Furthermore, “a state is not a ‘person’ for purposes of section 1983. Likewise ‘arms of

23

the State’ such as the Arizona Department of Corrections are not ‘persons’ under section

24

1983.” Gilbreath v. Cutter Biological, Inc., 931 F.2d 1320, 1327 (9th Cir. 1991) (citation

25

omitted).

26

Corrections.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

A.

....

Arizona Department of Corrections

Therefore, the Court will dismiss Defendant Arizona Department of

-4-

1

B.

2

Despite naming Defendants Smith and Coffy in his Complaint, Plaintiff never

3

once references them within his claims for relief or otherwise explains how they caused

4

any of his alleged injuries. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss Defendants Smith and

5

Coffy.

Defendants Smith and Coffy

6

C.

7

As an initial matter, it is unclear from his Complaint whether Plaintiff is alleging

8

an Eighth Amendment threat to safety claim, or a First Amendment retaliation claim (or

9

both) against Defendant Sanders. If Plaintiff is alleging that Defendant Sanders has

10

failed to ensure Plaintiff’s safety, such a claim requires a sufficiently culpable state of

11

mind by Defendant Sanders, known as “deliberate indifference.” Farmer v. Brennan,

12

511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994). Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or

13

lack of ordinary due care for the prisoner’s safety. Id. at 835. To state a claim of

14

deliberate indifference, plaintiffs must meet a two-part test.

15

constitutional deprivation must be, objectively, sufficiently serious”; and the “official’s

16

act or omission must result in the denial of the minimal civilized measure of life’s

17

necessities.” Id. at 834 (internal quotations omitted). Second, the prison official must

18

have a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with “deliberate indifference

19

to inmate health or safety.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). In defining “deliberate

20

indifference” in this context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the

21

official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a

22

substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at 837

23

(emphasis added).

Defendant Sanders

“First, the alleged

24
25

failed to sufficiently allege that Defendant Sanders was both “aware of facts from which

26

the inference could be drawn that a substantial right of serious harm exists, and [that

27

Defendant Sanders] also [drew that] inference.” Id. Plaintiff’s conclusory allegations

28

JDDL-K

If he is raising an Eighth Amendment “deliberate indifference” claim, Plaintiff has

that his family spoke with Defendant Sanders and that Defendant Sanders subsequently

-5-

1

denied Plaintiff’s grievance are insufficient to demonstrate that Defendant Sanders

2

actually inferred that denying Plaintiff’s grievance and failing to place him in protective

3

custody would result in a substantial risk of harm to Plaintiff. While Plaintiff alleges in

4

Count One that he had been threatened (and even assaulted) by other inmates in the past,

5

he does not sufficiently allege that Defendant Sanders was aware of those past threats and

6

assaults, or was otherwise presented with any facts “from which the inference could be

7

drawn that a substantial right of serious harm exists.”

8

If Plaintiff is raising a First Amendment retaliation claim, he has still failed to

9

sufficiently allege a cause of action. A viable claim of First Amendment retaliation

10

contains five basic elements: (1) an assertion that a state actor took some adverse action

11

against an inmate (2) because of (3) that prisoner’s protected conduct, and that such

12

action (4) chilled the inmate’s exercise of his First Amendment rights (or that the inmate

13

suffered more than minimal harm) and (5) did not reasonably advance a legitimate

14

correctional goal.

15

also Hines v. Gomez, 108 F.3d 265, 267 (9th Cir. 1997) (retaliation claims requires an

16

inmate to show (1) that the prison official acted in retaliation for the exercise of a

17

constitutionally protected right, and (2) that the action “advanced no legitimate

18

penological interest”). The plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating that his exercise of

19

his First Amendment rights was a substantial or motivating factor behind the defendants’

20

conduct. Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 (1977);

21

Soranno’s Gasco, Inc. v. Morgan, 874 F.2d 1310, 1314 (9th Cir. 1989).

Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir. 2005); see

22
23

Plaintiff’s exercise of his First Amendment rights, or that Plaintiff suffered more than

24

minimal harm as a result of Defendant Sanders’ actions. Plaintiff has not alleged, for

25

instance, that he has been unable or unwilling to continue his grievances or other

26

complaints in light of Defendant Sanders’ actions. While Plaintiff has alleged that his

27

property was seized and privileges revoked at Defendant Sanders’ direction, he has not

28

JDDL-K

Plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated that Defendant Sanders’ actions chilled

sufficiently alleged whether such deprivations are more than a minimal harm to him. For

-6-

1

instance, Plaintiff has not provided any information about what property was seized or

2

what privileges were revoked, and why those deprivations are more than minimally

3

harmful.

4

Accordingly, regardless of whether Plaintiff is alleging an Eighth Amendment

5

“deliberate indifference” claim or a First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant

6

Sanders, he has failed to sufficiently allege a claim for which relief could be granted, and

7

Defendant Sanders will be dismissed. Because Plaintiff has failed to allege a claim for

8

which relief could be granted against any named Defendant, his Complaint will be

9

dismissed.

10

V.

“Motion to Amend”

11

In his “Motion to Amend,” (Doc. 3) Plaintiff requests that the Court subpoena the

12

Arizona Department of Corrections for Plaintiff’s “805 protective custody files and

13

medical files.” The Court will, in its discretion, construe the motion as a motion for

14

discovery. However, because the Court has dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint with leave to

15

amend, and has not ordered service on any defendant, the motion is premature.

16

Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice.

17

VI.

Leave to Amend

18

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to

19

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a

20

first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will

21

mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If

22

Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended

23

complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

24
25

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name

26

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to

27

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of

28

JDDL-K

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of

-7-

1

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

2

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If

3

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific

4

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for

5

failure to state a claim.

6

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be

7

dismissed.

Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of

8

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

9

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

10

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

11

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

12

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

13

963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896

14

F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original

15

complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised

16

in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without

17

prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa

18

County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

19

VII.

Warnings

20

A.

21

If released from custody, Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee

22

within 120 days of his release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1)

23

notify the Court that he intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing,

24

why he cannot. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

Release

25

B.

26

If Plaintiff’s address changes, Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of

27

address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff

Address Changes

28

JDDL-K

-8-

1

must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to

2

comply may result in dismissal of this action.

3

C.

4

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

5

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further

6

notice to Plaintiff.

Copies

7

D.

8

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff

9

fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

10

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

11

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

12

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

13

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal

14

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,

15

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner

16

is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Possible “Strike”

17

E.

18

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

19

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

20

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

21

order of the Court).

22

IT IS ORDERED:

Possible Dismissal

23

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 4) is granted.

24

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government

25
26

fee of $23.80.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing

....

-9-

1

(3)

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff

2

has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in

3

compliance with this Order.

4

(4)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

5

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with

6

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

7
8

(5)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.

9

(6)

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Amend” (Doc. 3) is denied without prejudice.

10

(7)

All future filings must be captioned: CV 14-0665-PHX-DGC (MHB); the

11
12

Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket accordingly.1
Dated this 19th day of June, 2014.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JDDL-K

1

This matter was originally randomly assigned to then-Magistrate Judge Steven P.
Logan.
Judge Logan was subsequently appointed as a District Court Judge.
Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns has been randomly assigned to replace
Judge Logan in this matter.
- 10 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 5/1/2013

1

OR
Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 5/1/2013

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

. The first Defendant is employed as:

Name of first Defendant:
at

.

(Position and Title)
2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:

. The second Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:

. The third Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

6