Coomes v. Arpaio et al
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. The complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/10/14.(LSP)
1
2
MDR
WO
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Timothy Wayne Coomes,
10
11
12
No. CV 14-1118-PHX-DGC (DKD)
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
Joseph Arpaio, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Timothy Wayne Coomes, who is confined in the Maricopa County
16
Durango Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint1 (Doc. 1) and an Application to
17
Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to
18
amend.
19
I.
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
20
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.
21
§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
22
The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $23.81. The remainder of the fee will
23
be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to
24
Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C.
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
1
In the Jurisdiction section of his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Court has
jurisdiction pursuant to “Graves v. Arpaio.” As discussed in more detail below, this is
not a proper jurisdictional basis for a lawsuit. For purposes of this Order, the Court will
construe Plaintiff’s Complaint as filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, if
Plaintiff files an amended complaint, he must identify a proper basis for this Court’s
jurisdiction over his claims.
1
§ 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government
2
agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula.
3
II.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
4
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief
5
against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28
6
U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff
7
has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon
8
which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
9
immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
10
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
11
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8
12
does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-
13
defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”
14
(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
15
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678
16
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
17
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
18
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual
19
content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable
20
for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible
21
claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw
22
on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s
23
specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must
24
assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.
25
at 681.
26
27
courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,
28
JDDL-K
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,
342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less
-2-
1
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.
2
Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).
3
If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other
4
facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal
5
of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).
6
Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may
7
possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.
8
III.
Complaint
9
In his three-count Complaint, Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph
10
Arpaio, the Towers Jail, and the Durango Jail. In his Request for Relief, Plaintiff seeks
11
monetary damages.
12
IV.
Failure to State a Claim
13
Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,
14
520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey
15
v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a
16
liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the
17
claim that were not initially pled. Id.
18
19
In the “Jurisdiction” section of his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Court has
20
jurisdiction pursuant to Graves v. Arpaio. With respect to any claim for monetary
21
damages, Graves v. Arpaio, CV 77-0479-PHX-NVW, provides no independent cause of
22
action.
23
damages, see Hiser v. Franklin, 94 F.3d 1287 (9th Cir. 1997), Plaintiff must demonstrate
24
some right of action and legal entitlement to the monetary damages he seeks. In a case
25
challenging the conditions of confinement of pretrial detainees, the most likely source of
26
a right to sue is 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has jurisdiction over such cases pursuant to
27
28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3).
28
JDDL-K
A.
....
Graves v. Arpaio
Although the class action does not foreclose an individual complaint for
-3-
1
2
However, as discussed in more detail below, even if Plaintiff had alleged that this
case arose under § 1983, he has still failed to state a claim.
3
B.
4
Section 1983 provides a cause of action against persons acting under color of state
5
law who have violated rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and federal
6
law. 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see also Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188, 190 (9th Cir.
7
1995). Plaintiff has failed to allege any constitutional or federal law violations. Thus, the
8
Court will dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s Complaint because it fails to state a
9
claim.
Failure to Allege the Violation of a Constitutional Right
10
C.
11
To state a valid claim under § 1983, plaintiffs must allege that they suffered a
12
specific injury as a result of specific conduct of a defendant and show an affirmative link
13
between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,
14
371-72, 377 (1976).
15
therefore, a defendant’s position as the supervisor of persons who allegedly violated
16
Plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not impose liability. Monell v. New York City Dep’t
17
of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691-92 (1978); Hamilton v. Endell, 981 F.2d 1062, 1067
18
(9th Cir. 1992); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). “Because vicarious
19
liability is inapplicable to Bivens and § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each
20
Government-official defendant, through the official’s own individual actions, has
21
violated the Constitution.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 676. “A plaintiff must allege facts, not
22
simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the
23
deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.
24
1998).
Defendant Arpaio
There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, and
25
Plaintiff has not alleged that Defendant Arpaio personally participated in a
26
deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, was aware of a deprivation and failed to
27
act, or formed policies that resulted in Plaintiff’s injuries.
28
JDDL-K
-4-
Plaintiff has made no
1
allegations at all against Defendant Arpaio.
2
prejudice Defendant Arpaio.
Thus, the Court will dismiss without
3
D.
4
Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail are not a proper Defendants. Section
5
1983 imposes liability on any “person” who violates an individual’s federal rights while
6
acting under color of state law. Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail are buildings or
7
collections of buildings, neither is a person or legally created entity capable of being
8
sued. Therefore, the Court will dismiss Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail.
9
V.
Improper Defendants
Leave to Amend
10
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to
11
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a
12
first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will
13
mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If
14
Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended
15
complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.
16
Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First
17
Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its
18
entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original
19
Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.
20
If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements
21
telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name
22
of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to
23
do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of
24
Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of
25
that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.
26
27
Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific
28
JDDL-K
Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If
injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for
-5-
1
failure to state a claim.
2
Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be
3
dismissed.
Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of
4
Plaintiff should take note that a pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional
5
conditions of confinement arises from the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause
6
rather than from the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual
7
punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 and n.16 (1979). Nevertheless, the same
8
standards are applied, requiring proof that the defendant acted with deliberate
9
indifference. See Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998).
10
Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary
11
due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 835 (1994). To
12
state a claim of deliberate indifference, plaintiffs must meet a two-part test. “First, the
13
alleged constitutional deprivation must be, objectively, sufficiently serious”; and the
14
“official’s act or omission must result in the denial of the minimal civilized measure of
15
life’s necessities.” Id. at 834 (internal quotations omitted). Second, the prison official
16
must have a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with “deliberate
17
indifference to inmate health or safety.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). In defining
18
“deliberate indifference” in this context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective
19
test: “the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn
20
that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at
21
837 (emphasis added).
22
23
conditions amount to “punishment” without due process in violation of the Fourteenth
24
Amendment. Bell, 441 U.S. at 535. A jail or prison must provide prisoners with
25
“adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety.”
26
Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 1982). However, this does not mean that
27
federal courts can, or should, interfere whenever prisoners are inconvenienced or suffer
28
JDDL-K
The specific inquiry with respect to pretrial detainees is whether the prison
de minimis injuries. See Bell, 441 U.S. at 539 n.21 (noting that a de minimis level of
-6-
1
imposition does not rise to a constitutional violation).
2
confinement rises to the level of a constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the
3
duration of an inmate’s exposure to that condition. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083,
4
1089 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978)).
Whether a condition of
5
Plaintiff should take note that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require
6
“only that prisoners receive food that is adequate to maintain health; it need not be tasty
7
or aesthetically pleasing. ‘The fact that the food occasionally contains foreign objects or
8
sometimes is served cold, while unpleasant, does not amount to a constitutional
9
deprivation.’” LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1456 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted)
10
(quoting Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1575 (11th Cir. 1985)). An inmate
11
may, however, state a claim where he alleges that he is served meals with insufficient
12
calories for long periods of time. Id.
13
In addition, overcrowding alone does not violate the Eighth or Fourteenth
14
Amendments. Hoptowit, 682 F.2d at 1249. A plaintiff may, however, state a cognizable
15
claim where he or she alleges that overcrowding results in some unconstitutional
16
condition. See, e.g., Akao v. Shimoda, 832 F.2d 119, 120 (9th Cir. 1987) (reversing
17
district court’s dismissal of claim that overcrowding caused increased stress, tension, and
18
communicable diseases, and confrontations between inmates); see also Toussaint v.
19
Yockey, 722 F.2d 1490, 1492 (9th Cir. 1984) (constitutional violation may occur as a
20
result of overcrowded prison conditions causing increased violence, tension and
21
psychiatric problems).
22
23
963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896
24
F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original
25
complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised
26
in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without
27
prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa
28
JDDL-K
A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet,
County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).
-7-
1
VI.
Warnings
2
A.
3
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his
4
release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he
5
intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to
6
comply may result in dismissal of this action.
Release
7
B.
8
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with
9
Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion
10
for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in
11
dismissal of this action.
Address Changes
12
C.
13
Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
14
LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further
15
notice to Plaintiff.
Copies
16
D.
17
Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff
18
fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the
19
dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
20
Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil
21
judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more
22
prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal
23
in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,
24
malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner
25
is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Possible “Strike”
26
27
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including
28
JDDL-K
E.
these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963
Possible Dismissal
-8-
1
F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any
2
order of the Court).
3
IT IS ORDERED:
4
(1)
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.
5
(2)
As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government
6
agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing
7
fee of $23.81.
8
9
10
11
(3)
The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff
has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in
compliance with this Order.
(4)
If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of
12
Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with
13
prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
14
15
16
(5)
The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a
civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 10th day of June, 2014.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
-9-
Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:
Revised 5/1/2013
1
Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119
Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010
7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2
12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3
1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.
FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.
4
Name and Prisoner/Booking Number
Place of Confinement
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(Full Name of Plaintiff)
Plaintiff,
vs.
(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).
G
Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.
)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint
A. JURISDICTION
1.
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:
.
Institution/city where violation occurred:
.
Revised 5/1/2013
1
550/555
B. DEFENDANTS
1.
Name of first Defendant:
. The first Defendant is employed as:
at
.
(Position and Title)
2.
(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:
Name of second Defendant:
at
.
(Position and Title)
3.
(Institution)
Name of third Defendant:
. The third Defendant is employed as:
at
.
(Position and Title)
4.
(Institution)
Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)
. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)
If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.
C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.
Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?
2.
If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?
G Yes
G No
. Describe the previous lawsuits:
a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.
2
D. CAUSE OF ACTION
1.
COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3
1.
COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4
1.
COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.
5
E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:
.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF
(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)
(Signature of attorney, if any)
(Attorney’s address & telephone number)
ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?