Derboghossian v. DeRosa

Filing 22

ORDER ACCEPTING 21 Magistrate Judge Aspey's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate of appealability is required. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/29/15. (LSP)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Nazreth Derboghossian,
Petitioner,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-14-01289-PHX-GMS

Charles DeRosa,

13

Respondent.

14
15

Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and

16

United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).

17

Docs. 1, 21. The R&R recommends that the Court deny and dismiss the Petition with

18

prejudice. Doc. 21 at 7. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen

19

days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be

20

considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 7 (citing Fed. R. Civ.

21

P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

22

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to

23

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149

24

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is

25

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must

26

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly

27

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-

28

taken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny and dismiss the Petition with prejudice.

1

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in

2

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ.

3

P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended

4

disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with

5

instructions.”).

6

IT IS ORDERED:

7

1.

Magistrate Judge Aspey’s R&R (Doc. 21) is accepted.

8

2.

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and

9

dismissed with prejudice.

10

3.

The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

11

4.

Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate

12
13

of appealability is required.
Dated this 29th day of January, 2015.

14
15
16

Honorable G. Murray Snow
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-