Soto #84193 v. Ryan et al

Filing 79

ORDER that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 75 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court dismiss Defendants Rodriguez and Ramirez from this case for Plaintiff's failure to serve these Defendants within the time required by the Court. (Doc. 10 .) Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/14/2015. (KMG)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Angel Soto,
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

Charles Ryan, et al.,

13
14

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-14-1323-PHX-SMM (DMF)

ORDER

15

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

16

1983. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine. (Docs. 10,

17

35.) On October 23, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation with

18

this Court. (Doc. 75.) To date, no objections have been filed.

19

STANDARD OF REVIEW

20

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

21

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

22

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have fourteen days from the service of a copy

23

of the Magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the

24

Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

25

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

26

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

27

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

28

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

1

Id.
DISCUSSION

2
3

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

4

Objections having been made by any party, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts the

5

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION

6
7

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth,

8

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation

9

of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 75.)

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court dismiss Defendants Rodriguez

11

and Ramirez from this case for Plaintiff’s failure to serve these Defendants within the time

12

required by the Court. (Doc. 10.)

13

DATED this 14th day of December, 2015.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-