Wilson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 5

ORDER, Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 is granted; the Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/3/14. (REW)

1
2

MGD

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

William Alvin Wilson,

10
11
12

No. CV 14-1620-PHX-DGC (MEA)

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff William Alvin Wilson, who is confined in the Maricopa County Lower

16

Buckeye Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

17

(Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will

18

dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.

19

I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

20
21

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

22

The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. Id. The statutory filing fee will be

23

collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to

24

Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C.

25

§ 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government

26

agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula.

27

....

28

JDDL-K

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

....

1

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

2

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

3

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

4

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

5

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

6

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

7

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2).

8

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

9

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8

10

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-

11

defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

12

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

13

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

14

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

15

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

16

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual

17

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable

18

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible

19

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw

20

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s

21

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must

22

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

23

at 681.

24
25

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

26

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less

27

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

28

JDDL-K

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).

-2-

1

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other

2

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal

3

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).

4

Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may

5

possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.

6

III.

Complaint

7

In his three-count Complaint, Plaintiff names the following Defendants: the

8

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”); “MCSO Staff,” employed as “Detention

9

Officer Staff”; Lower Buckeye Jail, employed as “Medical Staff”; and the Maricopa

10

County Board of Supervisors. Plaintiff seeks damages.

11

In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that he was denied constitutionally adequate

12

medical care and alleges the following facts: On July 1, 2014, Plaintiff cut his leg on a

13

piece of sharp metal that was sticking out from the window frame of the day room in

14

Tower 14B. The metal was rusty and dirty. MCSO Staff did not immediately inform

15

medical. Plaintiff told the on-call medication nurse about his injury, but she did not

16

inform medical either. Plaintiff was in need of stitches and possibly a tetanus shot

17

because the cut was so deep “you could see the fat in [Plaintiff’s] leg.” Plaintiff “put in

18

to see medical,” but was not seen for two days. Plaintiff had his leg wrapped in a dirty

19

sock as a makeshift bandage until he was seen by medical. When Plaintiff saw medical

20

two days later on July 3, 2014, the nurse said Plaintiff should have been sent to the

21

hospital for stitches. Plaintiff did not get a tetanus shot until he complained by grievance

22

the day after he was seen by medical. Plaintiff apparently received the tetanus shot on

23

July 4, 2014. Plaintiff has suffered severe pain and a swollen, infected leg, headaches

24

from discomfort from walking on his injured leg, and lack of sleep due to pain.

25
26

facts: “Each Defendant failed to get maintenance to cut off or grind down the sharp piece

27

of rusty[,] jagged metal in Tower 14B” both before and after Plaintiff cut himself.

28

JDDL-K

In Count Two, Plaintiff asserts a threat to safety claim and alleges the following

Maintenance tried to fix the window by banging down the metal to a flush surface, but it

-3-

1

is still sharp and hazardous and poses a danger to other inmates who are unaware of its

2

presence.

3

In Count Three, Plaintiff alleges the following facts: “MCSO Staff did not inform

4

medical staff of [Plaintiff’s] emergency medical situation.” Once medical staff was

5

informed, they did not give Plaintiff immediate medical attention and Plaintiff had to file

6

a grievance in order to get bandages for his leg. Plaintiff had to submit a health needs

7

request to get a tetanus shot, “which should have been given without a health needs

8

request form filled out by [Plaintiff].”

9

IV.

Failure to State a Claim

10

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

11

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

12

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

13

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

14

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

15

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

16

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

17

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

18

A.

19

The MCSO is not a proper defendant. In Arizona, the responsibility of operating

20

jails and caring for prisoners is placed by law upon the sheriff. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann.

21

§ 11-441(A)(5); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 31-101.

22

administrative creation of the county sheriff to allow him to carry out his statutory duties

23

and is not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. Accordingly, the Maricopa

24

County Sheriff’s Office will be dismissed as a Defendant.

MCSO

A sheriff’s office is simply an

25
26

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the individual members of that

27

Board are not proper Defendants and must be dismissed. Local government bodies, such

28

JDDL-K

B.

as Arizona counties, are persons under § 1983 and may be sued for constitutional injuries.

Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

-4-

1

Liability may be imposed on the county if a plaintiff establishes that his injuries were

2

inflicted pursuant to an official county policy or custom. Thompson v. City of Los

3

Angeles, 885 F.2d 1439, 1443 (9th Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). Official county policy

4

may only be set by an official with “final policymaking authority.” Id. (citing Pembaur

5

v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 481-83 (1986) (plurality opinion)). To identify those

6

officials with “final policymaking authority,” the Court looks to state law. Id. (citing City

7

of St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 126 (1988) (plurality opinion) (quotations

8

omitted)).

9

In Arizona, the responsibility of operating jails is placed by law upon the Sheriff,

10

not on the county’s Board of Supervisors. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-441(A)(5); Ariz.

11

Rev. Stat. § 31-101. Therefore, the Board of Supervisors is not liable to Plaintiff under

12

§ 1983 because it lacks authority to establish an official policy with respect to the

13

operation of the jail. Further, the Board cannot be held liable for the actions of the

14

Sheriff or his deputies on a theory of respondeat superior liability. See Thompson, 885

15

F.2d at 1443. Accordingly, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will be dismissed.

16

C.

17

Plaintiff names the Maricopa County Lower Buckeye Jail as a Defendant.

18

However, a jail is not a proper defendant. Claims under § 1983 are directed at “bodies

19

politic and corporate.” Monell v. N.Y. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 688-89 (1978).

20

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Congress intended municipalities and other local

21

government units to be included among those persons to whom § 1983 applies. Id. at

22

689-690. Because a jail is neither a corporation nor a body politic, it is not a “person” for

23

purposes of § 1983. See, e.g., Petaway v. City of New Haven Police Dep’t, 541 F.

24

Supp.2d 504 (D. Conn. 2008); Pahle v. Colebrookdale Twp., 227 F. Supp.2d 361 (E.D.

25

Pa. 2002). Accordingly, the Lower Buckeye Jail will be dismissed.

Lower Buckeye Jail

26
27

In addition to unnamed “MCSO Staff” members, it appears that Plaintiff is

28

JDDL-K

D.

attempting to sue unnamed detention officers and members of the medical staff at the

MCSO Staff, Detention Officers and Medical Staff

-5-

1

Lower Buckeye Jail. Plaintiff should be aware that Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of

2

Civil Procedure requires the plaintiff to include the names of the parties in the action. As

3

a practical matter, it is impossible in most instances for the United States Marshal or his

4

designee to serve a summons and complaint or amended complaint upon an anonymous

5

defendant. The Ninth Circuit has held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing

6

of a complaint, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify

7

the unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities,

8

or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177

9

F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir.

10

1980)).

11

Where the names of individual defendants are unknown at the time a complaint is

12

filed, a plaintiff may refer to the individual unknown defendants as Defendant John (or

13

Jane) Doe 1, John Doe 2, and so on, and allege facts to support how each particular Doe

14

defendant violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights, including when, where, and how.

15

Plaintiff may not simply identify a group of Defendants and allege that the group violated

16

his constitutional rights. A plaintiff may thereafter use the discovery process to obtain

17

the names of fictitiously-named defendants whom he believes violated his constitutional

18

rights and seek leave to amend to name those defendants.

19

Accordingly, Defendants MCSO Staff, Detention Officers and Medical Staff will

20

be dismissed.

21

V.

Leave to Amend

22

Because Plaintiff has failed to name a proper Defendant, Plaintiff’s Complaint will

23

be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30

24

days, Plaintiff may submit a first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined

25

above. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a

26

first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may

27

strike the amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

28

JDDL-K

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

-6-

1

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name

2

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to

3

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of

4

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of

5

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.

6

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If

7

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific

8

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for

9

failure to state a claim.

Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of

10

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be

11

dismissed.

12

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

13

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

14

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

15

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

16

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

17

963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896

18

F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original

19

complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised

20

in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without

21

prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa

22

County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

23
24

medical treatment states a violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a

25

§ 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendants acted with “deliberate

26

indifference to serious medical needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir.

27

2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a

28

JDDL-K

Plaintiff should be aware that not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate

“serious medical need” by demonstrating that failure to treat the condition could result in

-7-

1

further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the

2

defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 (quotations

3

omitted).

4

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d

5

1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must

6

both know of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be

7

aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious

8

harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

9

837 (1994).

Deliberate indifference in the medical context may be shown by a

10

purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and

11

harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may

12

also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies, delays, or interferes with

13

medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the prisoner’s medical needs.

14

Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

15

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary

16

due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor

17

gross negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of

18

Corr., 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter Labs.,

19

622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

20

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion

21

does not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.”

22

Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care,

23

without more, is insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate

24

indifference. See Shapley v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407

25

(9th Cir. 1985). The indifference must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of

26

“unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

27
28

JDDL-K

Likewise, to state a claim for threat to safety, an inmate must allege facts to
support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm and

-8-

1

that prison officials were “deliberately indifferent” to those risks. Farmer, 511 U.S. at

2

832-33. To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must allege facts to

3

support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate safety. Id.

4

at 837. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the

5

inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must

6

also [have] draw[n] the inference.” Id.

7

VI.

Warnings

8

A.

9

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his

10

release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he

11

intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to

12

comply may result in dismissal of this action.

Release

13

B.

14

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with

15

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion

16

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in

17

dismissal of this action.

Address Changes

18

C.

19

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

20

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further

21

notice to Plaintiff.

Copies

22
23

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff

24

fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

25

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

26

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

27

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

28

JDDL-K

D.

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal

Possible “Strike”

-9-

1

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,

2

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner

3

is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4

E.

5

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

6

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

7

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

8

order of the Court).

9

IT IS ORDERED:

Possible Dismissal

10

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

11

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government

12

agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial

13

filing fee.

14

(3)

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff

15

has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in

16

compliance with this Order.

17

(4)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

18

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with

19

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

20
21
22

(5)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 3rd day of October, 2014.

23
24
25
26
27
28

JDDL-K

- 10 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 5/1/2013

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 5/1/2013

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:

. The first Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
2.

(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:

Name of second Defendant:
at

.

(Position and Title)
3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:

. The third Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

6