Rosciano v. Experian et al

Filing 56

ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc., (Doc. 52 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the order of 04/01/15 (Doc. 50 ), is vacated. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/1/15. (NKS)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Jose Rosciano,

No. CV-14-02102-PHX-NVW
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

ORDER

Experian, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc. (Doc.

16

52), the Response (Doc. 53), and the Reply (Doc. 54). In the court’s discretion, late

17

commencement of the arbitration will be allowed.

18

reconsideration of its April 1, 2015 order (Doc. 50), that Plaintiff’s failure to comply with

19

the prior orders compelling arbitration (Doc. 37, 49) does not warrant dismissal with

20

prejudice. Those orders require arbitration only of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant

21

T-Mobile USA, Inc.; they do not subject to arbitration any other party against whom this

22

case has already been dismissed.

23
24

The court also concludes, upon

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Order of
Dismissal, etc., (Doc. 52) is granted.

25
26

/ / /

27

/ / /

28

/ //

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the order of April 1, 2015 (Doc. 50), is vacated.

4

Dated: May 1, 2015.

5
6

Neil V. Wake
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-