Harris v. Arpaio et al
Filing
49
ORDER ADOPTING 47 Report and Recommendation. This action is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. Clerk to terminate case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/20/15. (EJA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Matthew Linden Harris,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV14-2158 PHX DGC
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
Plaintiff Matthew Linden Harris has filed a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to
16
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade has issued a
17
report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the action be dismissed without
18
prejudice for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). Doc. 47. No
19
objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R.
20
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
21
(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court
22
will accept the R&R and dismiss this action without prejudice.
23
IT IS ORDERED:
24
1.
The R&R (Doc. 47) is accepted.
25
2.
This action is dismissed without prejudice.
26
3.
A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
27
28
appeal are denied.
1
4.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.
2
Dated this 20th day of October, 2015.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‐ 2 ‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?