Ortega v. Wright et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 32 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7 ) is dismissed. Clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 8/30/16. (DXD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Aaron James Ortega, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 vs. Zachary Wright and Douglas Kies, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-14-02173-PHX-PGR (DKD) ORDER 16 Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 17 Judge Duncan in light of Plaintiff’s Response to the Court’s Report and 18 Recommendation (Doc. 33) and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Objection to Report 19 and Recommendation (Doc. 34), the Court finds that the plaintiff’s objections should 20 be overruled because the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that this action must 21 be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) 22 inasmuch as the claims in the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) are barred as a 23 matter of law under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Therefore, 24 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32) is accepted and adopted by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 1 7) is dismissed in its entirety, without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. 2 The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 3 DATED this 30th day of August, 2016. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?