Williams v. Cisneros et al

Filing 10

ORDER, the First Amended Complaint 9 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/24/15. (REW)

1
2

SKC
WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Berry Williams,

10
11
12

No. CV 14-2231-PHX-DGC (DKD)
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

Unknown Cisneros, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On October 8, 2014, Plaintiff Berry Williams, who is confined in the Arizona

16

State Prison Complex-Yuma in San Luis, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint

17

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a

18

January 14, 2015 Order, the Court granted the Application to Proceed and dismissed the

19

Complaint because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days

20

to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order.
On March 13, 2015, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (Doc. 9). The

21
22

Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend.

23

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

24

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

25

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

26

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

27

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

28
JDDL-K

1

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

2

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2).

3

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

4

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8

5

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-

6

defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

7

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

8

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

9

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

10

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

11

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual

12

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable

13

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible

14

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw

15

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s

16

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must

17

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

18

at 681.

19

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

20

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

21

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less

22

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

23

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).

24

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other

25

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal

26

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).

27

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but

28
-2–
JDDL-K

1

because it may possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave

2

to amend.

3

II.

First Amended Complaint

4

In his single-count First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff sues Charles L. Ryan,

5

Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (“ADOC”); Lance Hetmer and Greg

6

Fizer, Wardens at the ADOC; and Unknown Cisneros, Unknown Badsted, and Unknown

7

Reigie, Correctional Officers (“COs”) at the ADOC.

8

Amendment “cruel and unusual punishment” claim based on the allegations that he was

9

“attacked and beaten” while in ADOC custody.

Plaintiff asserts an Eighth

10

Plaintiff alleges that on November 22, 2013, Defendant Cisneros was the “floor

11

officer,” supported by Defendant Reigie, who was in the “front key[-]cage,” controlling

12

access to cells 1 through 16, and Defendant Badsted, who was in the “rear key[-] cage,”

13

controlling access to cells 17 through 25. Badsted opened Plaintiff’s cell, and Cisneros

14

walked him to the shower but failed to handcuff him “as was usual.” Upon return,

15

Plaintiff was left outside his cell while Cisneros escorted another inmate from the shower.

16

Badsted did not make any move to unlock Plaintiff’s cell to let him re-enter before any

17

other inmate was let out. Plaintiff was approached by Inmate Nobles from cell 16, with

18

Cisneros following behind. Nobles was also not handcuffed, and he attacked Plaintiff.

19

Plaintiff was “pummeled about the head and face, [and] thrown into the bars and to the

20

floor.” He injured his back and twisted his left leg that had previously been injured in a

21

car accident. Plaintiff alleges that, but for Cisneros’ failure to place inmates in handcuffs,

22

Badsted’s failure to open Plaintiff’s cell, and Reigie’s “blind eye,” he would not have

23

been attacked.

24

Plaintiff’s remaining allegations pertain to events that took place after he received

25

medical attention for his injuries. Plaintiff alleges that he was approached by Sgt.

26

Stevenson, who offered him a television “with the understanding that [Plaintiff] would

27

pursue no action in the incident.” Plaintiff accepted the offer because he is an indigent

28

inmate with a life sentence and no financial means of support. Two months later,
-3–
JDDL-K

1

however, the television “was taken back” because enough time had then passed to render

2

Plaintiff’s complaint moot. Plaintiff appealed to the Deputy Warden Defendant Fizer;

3

then to the Warden Defendant Hetmer; and finally to the ADOC Director Ryan. Each

4

time, his complaint “was treated as trivial and of little consequence.”

5

Plaintiff alleges that he suffered a strain to his lower back and aggravation to his

6

leg injury, but the emotional and mental injuries he suffers are more severe. He alleges

7

that due to the “inconsequential way in which [his] situation was treated,” he suffers

8

constant fear for his safety. He further alleges that the “slight relief” he was given in the

9

form of a television was taken away. Plaintiff claims to suffer from extreme depression

10

and anxiety when he is outside his cell.

11

Plaintiff seeks monetary and punitive damages and to have a working television

12

provided him for the duration of his sentence per ADOC’s agreement with him made by

13

Sgt. Stevenson.

14

III.

Failure to State a Claim

15

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

16

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

17

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

18

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

19

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

20

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

21

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

22

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

23

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,

24

520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey

25

v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a

26

liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the

27

claim that were not initially pled. Id.

28
-4–
JDDL-K

1

Plaintiff fails to state an Eighth Amendment claim as to any Defendant. An

2

Eighth Amendment claim requires a sufficiently culpable state of mind by the

3

Defendants, known as “deliberate indifference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834

4

(1994). Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary

5

due care for the prisoner’s safety. Id. at 835. To state a claim of deliberate indifference,

6

plaintiffs must meet a two-part test. “First, the alleged constitutional deprivation must be,

7

objectively, sufficiently serious”; and the “official’s act or omission must result in the

8

denial of the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.”

9

quotations omitted). Second, the prison official must have a “sufficiently culpable state

10

of mind,” i.e., he must act with “deliberate indifference to inmate health or safety.” Id.

11

(internal quotations omitted). In defining “deliberate indifference” in this context, the

12

Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the official must both be aware of facts

13

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists,

14

and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at 837 (emphasis added).

Id. at 834 (internal

15

A.

16

Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendants Cisneros, Reigie, and Badsted are too

17

vague and conclusory to state an Eighth Amendment claim. Plaintiff’s only allegations

18

against Defendant Cisneros are that while working as “floor officer” she escorted

19

Plaintiff to the shower and back without handcuffs; she left Plaintiff outside his cell when

20

she went to escort another inmate from the shower; and she was following behind Inmate

21

Nobles when he attacked Plaintiff. It is unclear from the facts alleged whether Cisneros

22

was even with Nobles or was escorting a different inmate at the time of the attack. It is

23

also unclear what precipitated the attack or what Cisneros did or failed to do in response.

24

Absent facts showing that Cisneros knew of and acted with deliberate indifference to a

25

threat posed by Nobles, the mere fact that she was present when Plaintiff was attacked is

26

insufficient to state an Eighth Amendment claim.

Defendants Cisneros, Reigie, and Badsted

27

Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Reigie and Badsted are even more

28

minimal. Plaintiff alleges only that Reigie was in the front key-cage operating the locks
-5–
JDDL-K

1

to the lower-numbered cells at the time of Plaintiff’s attack. This is not enough to show

2

that Reigie was aware of a substantial risk of serious harm to Plaintiff prior to the alleged

3

attack or that he acted with deliberate indifference to it. Plaintiff’s allegations against

4

Defendant Badsted are only slightly more specific.

5

operating the locks from the rear key-cage; he unlocked the door to Plaintiff’s cell when

6

Defendant Cisneros took Plaintiff to the shower; and he failed to unlock Plaintiff’s cell

7

upon return. Even assuming, as Plaintiff alleges, that the attack would not have occurred

8

if Badsted had unlocked Plaintiff’s cell, allowing him to reenter, this is not enough to

9

show deliberate indifference. Absent any facts showing that Badsted had been alerted –

10

or otherwise had reason to believe – that Plaintiff was in danger, his failure to unlock

11

Plaintiff’s cell door sooner does not show that he acted with deliberate indifference to a

12

serious threat to Plaintiff’s safety.

13

Defendants failed to follow policy, requiring them to handcuff inmates when they were

14

taken outside their cells, at most show negligence; they do not show that these

15

Defendants were aware of a serious threat to Plaintiff’s safety and were deliberately

16

indifferent to that threat.

He alleges that Badsted was

Similarly, the allegations that any or all of the

17

B.

18

Plaintiff’s only allegations against Defendants Fizer, Hetmer, and Ryan are that

19

Plaintiff appealed to each of them after the television was taken away, and, “[a]t each

20

step, [his] complaint was treated as trivial and of little consequence.” These allegations

21

are too vague and conclusory to state a claim. It is not clear what Plaintiff was appealing

22

to these Defendants – whether the alleged attack or the taking of the television – much

23

less what he presented to them or what they did or failed to do in response. Moreover, to

24

the extent Plaintiff sues these Defendants solely for their denials of grievances and not for

25

any involvement in the underlying violations, this is not enough to state a constitutional

26

claim. See Shehee v. Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999) (defendants did not

27

commit constitutional violations when they denied administrative grievances, failed to

28

intervene on plaintiff’s behalf, and failed to remedy allegedly unconstitutional behavior).

Defendants Fizer, Hetmer, and Ryan

-6–
JDDL-K

1

IV.

Leave to Amend

2

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed

3

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff

4

may submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The

5

Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second

6

amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may

7

strike the second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to

8

Plaintiff.

9

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second

10

Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in

11

its entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

12

Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one

13

claim per count.

14

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

15

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name

16

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to

17

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of

18

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of

19

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.

20

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If

21

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific

22

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for

23

failure to state a claim.

24

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be

25

dismissed.

Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of

26

A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First

27

Amended Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal

28

Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After
-7–
JDDL-K

1

amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as

2

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the

3

original complaint or first amended complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was

4

dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint.

5

Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

6

V.

Warnings

7

A.

8

If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not

9

been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court

10

that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or

11

(2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may

12

result in dismissal of this action.

Release

13

B.

14

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with

15

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion

16

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in

17

dismissal of this action.

Address Changes

18

C.

19

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

20

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further

21

notice to Plaintiff.

Copies

22

D.

23

Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a

24

claim, if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies

25

identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes”

26

provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring

27

a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the

28

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,

Possible “Strike”

-8–
JDDL-K

1

brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the

2

grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

3

granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28

4

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

5

E.

6

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

7

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

8

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

9

order of the Court).

10

IT IS ORDERED:

11

(1)

Possible Dismissal

The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 9) is dismissed for failure to state a

12

claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended

13

complaint in compliance with this Order.

14

(2)

If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the

15

Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action

16

with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.

17

§ 1915(g).

18

(3)

19
20

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 24th day of April, 2015.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-9–
JDDL-K

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 5/1/2013

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 5/1/2013

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:

. The first Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
2.

(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:

Name of second Defendant:
at

.

(Position and Title)
3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:

. The third Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

6