Airbus DS Optronics GmbH v. Nivisys LLC et al
ORDER approving 100 Stipulation re: Subpoena. See attached Order for details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/17/2015. (TLB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Airbus DS Optronics GmbH,
Nivisys LLC, et al.,
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Plaintiff Airbus DS Optronics
GmbH (“Airbus”) and non-party First Texas Holdings Corporation (“First Texas”) have
stipulated and agreed to the entry of the following Stipulated Order applying the terms of
the Protective Order, previously entered by this Court on June 30, 2015, to the production
of documents by non-party First Texas to Airbus in response to Airbus’s Subpoena, dated
January 21, 2015, served on First Texas. The Court has previously found that this action
may involve trade secrets and other valuable research, development, commercial,
financial and technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from
public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is
warranted. Accordingly, in order to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the
prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately
protect information that First Texas is entitled or required to keep confidential, and to
ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in
preparation for and in the conduct of trial,
IT IS ORDERED approving the stipulation filed at Doc. 100.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Protective Order entered at Doc. 92 shall
apply to the production of documents by non-party First Texas Holdings Corporation
pursuant to the subpoena served on First Texas Holdings Corporation by Plaintiff Airbus
in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the definition of “Documents” in the
Protective Order entered at Doc. 92 is clarified, as applied to First Texas Holdings
Corporation, to specifically include electronically-stored information, electronicallystored documents, and hard copies of documents. Nothing in this clarification is intended
to affect the definition of “Documents” in the Protective Order as it applies to other nonparties or parties.
Dated this 17th day of September, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?