Siegel et al v. Dignity Health
Filing
237
AMENDED ORDER granting 233 Defendant's Motion for Appeal Bond. Defendant shall place a surety bond in the amount of $179,000.00 with the Clerk of Court according to the procedures required with the Clerk by November 6, 2020. Upon receipt of the bond by the Clerk of Court, the judgment against Defendant shall be stayed pursuant to Rule 62(b). Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 11/4/2020. (LMR)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
Mitchell Siegel, et al.,
9
10
Plaintiffs,
vs.
11
12
Dignity Health,
Defendant.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-14-02561-PHX-SPL
AMENDED ORDER1
15
Before the Court is Defendant Dignity Health’s Notice of Motion and Motion for
16
Appeal Bond. (Doc. 233) Defendant has appealed its case to the Ninth Circuit and asks the
17
Court to approve the appeal bond to be posted in the amount of $179,000. The Motion is
18
fully briefed and ready for review. (Docs. 234, 235)
19
I.
BACKGROUND
20
Plaintiffs Mitchell Siegel and his wife Dawn Siegel prevailed at the jury trial, but
21
the jury declined to award damages, instead writing only “Legal Fees” in the damages
22
section of the verdict form. (Doc. 227 at 2) The Court vacated the award and granted
23
Plaintiffs permission to file a motion for fees. (Doc. 277 at 2) The Court later granted as
24
modified Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys’ Fees against Defendant in the amount of
25
$175,933.42. (Doc. 227 at 8) Plaintiffs did not seek costs. Plaintiffs appealed on another
26
issue. Defendant cross-appealed, disputing the validity of the award for various reasons.
27
28
1
This Order amends line 9 on page 3 of the October 27, 2020 Order. (Doc. 236)
1
Siegal et al. v. Dignity Health, No. 20-16333 (9th Cir. filed July 8, 2020). Defendant seeks
2
to post a bond in the amount of judgment against it to stay execution of the judgment
3
pending the appeal. (Doc. 233 at 1)
4
II.
LEGAL STANDARD
5
The general rule is that a party may seek to enforce a judgment 30 days after it has
6
been entered. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(a). However, Rule 62(b) provides: “At any time after
7
judgment is entered, a party may obtain a stay by providing a bond or other security. The
8
stay takes effect when the court approves the bond or other security and remains in effect
9
for the time specified in the bond or other security.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b). “District courts
10
have inherent discretionary authority in setting supersedeas bonds; review is for abuse of
11
discretion.” Rachel v. Banana Republic, Inc., 831 F.2d 1503, 1505 n.1 (9th Cir. 1987).
12
III.
DISCUSSION
13
Defendant moves to set the bond at $179,000, taking into account two years’ worth
14
of interest on the award of fees and rounding up an additional $885 for the purposes of
15
providing for appellate costs.2 (Docs. 233-3 at 2–3, 235 at 1–2) Plaintiffs ask the Court to
16
set the bond instead somewhere between $220,000 and $264,000. (Doc. 234) Plaintiffs
17
allege that Defendant did not account for appellate costs, interest on the costs, and “an
18
amount to compensate the Siegels for the delay in being able to collect their attorneys’ fees
19
from the Defendant.” (Doc. 234 at 2) Plaintiffs suggest it would be proper to multiply the
20
fee award by 1.25 or 1.5 to arrive at a suitable bond amount. (Doc. 234 at 3) Plaintiffs have
21
not established that such an increase is necessary, failing to explain why they should be
22
compensated for a delay, especially when their original motion for fees shows their
23
attorneys were hired on a contingency basis. (Doc. 220 at 4) Furthermore, appellate costs
24
are accounted for in Defendant’s calculation. Defendant also points out interest on costs is
25
awarded on the costs from the underlying judgment, not on the costs from the appeal. 28
26
27
28
2
Defendant showed calculations of interest based on a .62% rate per week over two
years, resulting in $2,181.57 in interest. $2,181.57 + $175,933.42 (fee award) =
$178,114.99. $178,114.99 + $885.01 = $179,000.00
2
1
U.S.C. § 1961(a). (Doc. 235 at 2) Here, there were no costs requested or awarded in the
2
underlying judgment.
3
IV.
CONCLUSION
4
The Court finds that Defendant properly calculated interest on the attorneys’ fees
5
and properly added additional money to provide for appellate costs. The Court finds
6
Plaintiffs failed to show why they are entitled to an increase.
7
Therefore,
8
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Appeal Bond (Doc. 233) is granted.
9
Defendant shall place a surety bond in the amount of $179,000.00 with the Clerk of Court
10
according to the procedures required with the Clerk by November 6, 2020. Upon receipt of
11
the bond by the Clerk of Court, the judgment against Defendant shall be stayed pursuant
12
to Rule 62(b).
13
Dated this 4th day of November, 2020.
14
15
Honorable Steven P. Logan
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
cc: Finance
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?