Hanshaw #102163 v. Ryan et al

Filing 24

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 22 - Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 1/4/16. (LAD)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Sheldon Roy Hanshaw,

10

Petitioner,

11

v.

12

Charles L. Ryan; Attorney General of the
State of Arizona,

13
14

No. CV-14-02575-PHX-NVW (JZB)
ORDER
and
DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS

Respondents.

15

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of

16

Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle (Doc. 22) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of

17

Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that

18

the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the

19

parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 10 (citing 28

20

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72.

21

December 24, 2015 (Doc. 23).

Petitioner filed objections on

22

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and

23

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that

24

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

25

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the

26

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the

27

meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28

28

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Doc.22) is accepted.
Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order
denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability
and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied the dismissal of the Petition
is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural
ruling debatable.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying
and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.
Dated this 4th day of January, 2016.

14
15
16
Neil V. Wake
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2