Rucks v. Ryan et al

Filing 5

ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel as moot. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must p rovide Petitioner with a copy of the form recommended by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing an Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/26/15. (LAD)

Download PDF
1 2 SH WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Kevin R. Rucks, No. CV 14-2606-PHX-DGC (MHB) Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 Charles L. Ryan, et al., ORDER Respondents. 13 14 15 Petitioner Kevin R. Rucks, who was confined in the Arizona State Prison 16 Complex-Douglas, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and has paid the $5.00 filing fee. On December 12, 2014, 18 Petitioner filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3). The Court will dismiss the 19 Petition without prejudice and deny the Motion to Appoint Counsel. 20 I. Petition 21 On March 14, 2011, Petitioner was convicted, pursuant to plea agreements, in four 22 cases in Maricopa County Superior Court. In case #CR2010-136392, Petitioner was 23 convicted of hindering prosecution and sentenced to 2.25 years.1 In case #CR2010- 24 006561, Petitioner was convicted of forgery and sentenced to 4.5 years.2 In case 25 26 27 1 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/032011/m4646425.pdf (last visited Jan. 14, 2014). 2 28 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/032011/m4646426.pdf (last visited Jan. 14, 2014). 1 #CR2009-176839, Petitioner was convicted of possession or use of marijuana and 2 sentenced to one year.3 In case #CR2009-126573, Petitioner was convicted of possession 3 or use of dangerous drugs and sentenced to 4.5 years.4 Petitioner’s sentences were 4 ordered to run concurrently. On July 12, 2012, the Superior Court denied Petitioner’s 5 motions for post-conviction relief.5 Rather than file a petition for review in the Arizona 6 Court of Appeals, Petitioner filed special actions, but the Arizona Court of Appeals 7 denied jurisdiction. On July 16, 2012, Petitioner filed his first petition for a writ of 8 habeas corpus regarding the above-listed convictions, Rucks v. Ryan et al, 12-1522-PHX- 9 DGC (MHB). In a May 20, 2013 Order (Doc. 33 in 12-1522-PHX-DGC (MHB)), the 10 Court denied the petition, and the Clerk of Court entered Judgment accordingly (Doc. 34 11 in 12-1522-PHX-DGC (MHB)). 12 On December 1, 2014, Petitioner commenced the current case by filing a new 13 habeas petition in which he again challenges his convictions in CR2010-136392, 14 CR2010-006561, CR2009-176839, and CR2009-126573. This is Petitioner’s second 15 habeas challenge to his convictions in these cases. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, a petitioner 16 may not file a second or successive § 2254 petition in the district court unless the 17 petitioner has obtained a certification from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 18 authorizing the district court to consider the second or subsequent § 2254 petition. A 19 habeas petition is “‘second or successive’ if it raises claims that were or could have been 20 adjudicated on their merits in an earlier petition.” Cooper v. Calderon, 274 F.3d 1270, 21 1273 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). 22 successive petition. The current petition, therefore, is a second or 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/032011/m4646427.pdf (last visited Jan. 14, 2014). 4 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/032011/m4646428.pdf (last visited Jan. 14, 2014). 5 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/072012/m5326522.pdf (last visited Aug. 21, 2012). -2- 1 Petitioner has not presented a certification from the Ninth Circuit authorizing the 2 Court to consider a second or subsequent § 2254 petition. Accordingly, the current 3 Petition and this action must be dismissed as a successive petition. The Court will 4 dismiss the case without prejudice so that Petitioner can seek certification from the Ninth 5 Circuit to file a second or successive § 2254 petition. 6 IT IS ORDERED: 7 (1) 8 9 10 11 Because the Court will dismiss this action, Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3) is denied as moot. (2) Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (3) The Clerk of Court must provide Petitioner with a copy of the form 12 recommended by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing an Application for Leave 13 to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 14 U.S.C. § 2255. 15 (4) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the 16 event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability 17 because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See 18 Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 19 Dated this 26th day of January, 2015. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Form 12. (New, 7/1/02) Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the NINTH CIRCUIT 95 Seventh Street San Francisco, California 94103 Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Docket Number ________________________________________________________________ (to be provided by court) Petitioner's name _______________________________________________________________ Prisoner registration number Address ______________________________________________________________________ Instructions - Read Carefully (1) This application, whether handwritten or typewritten, must be legible and signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury. An original and five (5) copies must be provided to the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit. The application must comply with 9th Circuit Rule 22-3, which is attached to this form. (2) All questions must be answered concisely. Add separate sheets if necessary. (3) The petitioner shall serve a copy of this application and any attachments on respondent and must complete and file a proof of service with this application. (4) The petitioner shall attach to this application copies of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the district court's opinion in any prior federal habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255 or state why such documents are unavailable to petitioner. You Must Answer the Following Questions: (1) What conviction(s) are you challenging? ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ (2) In what court(s) were you convicted of these crime(s)? ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ (3) What was the date of each of your conviction(s) and what is the length of each sentence? ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ For questions (4) through (9), provide information separately for each of your previous §§ 2254 or 2255 proceedings. Use additional pages if necessary. (4) With respect to each conviction and sentence, have you ever filed a petition or motion for habeas corpus relief in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255? Yes G No G (a) In which federal district court did you file a petition or motion? ________________________________________________________________________ (b) What was the docket number? ______________________________________________ (c) On what date did you file the petition/motion? ___________________________________ (5) What grounds were raised in your previous habeas proceeding? (list all grounds and issues previously raised in that petition/ motion) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (6) Did the district court hold an evidentiary hearing? Yes G No G (7) How did the district court rule on your petition/motion? G G G District court dismissed petition/motion? If yes, on what grounds? __________________________________________________________________ District court denied petition/motion; District court granted relief; if yes, on what claims and what was the relief? __________________________________________________________________ (Attach copies of all reports and orders issued by the district court.) (8) (9) On what date did the district court decide your petition/motion? ________________________________________________________________________ Did you file an appeal from that disposition? Yes G No G (a) What was the docket number of your appeal? __________________________________ (b) How did the court of appeals decide your appeal?_______________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ (10) State concisely each and every ground or issue you wish to raise in your current petition or motion for habeas relief. Summarize briefly the facts supporting each ground or issue. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (11) For each ground raised, was it raised in the state courts? If so, what did the state courts rule and when? ________________________________________________________________________ (12) For each ground/issue raised, was this claim raised in any prior federal petition/motion? (list each ground separately) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (13) For each ground/issue raised, does this claim rely on a new rule of constitutional law? (list each ground separately and give case name and citation for each new rule of law) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (14) For each ground/issue raised, does this claim rely on newly discovered evidence? What is the evidence and when did you discover it? Why has this newly discovered evidence not been previously available to you? (list each ground separately) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (15) For each ground/issue raised, does the newly discovered evidence establish your innocence? How? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (16) For each ground/issue raised, does the newly discovered evidence establish a federal constitutional error? Which provision of the Constitution was violated and how? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ (17) Provide any other basis for your application not previously stated. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Date: __________________ Signature:_________________________________ Proof of Service on Respondent MUST be Attached.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?