Phillips v. Arizona, State of

Filing 22

ORDER denying 18 Request to File Only Relevant Portions of the Record. Respondents shall file all documents in compliance with Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 no later than February 5, 2016. Petitioner may file a reply no later than March 7, 2016. Petitioner's 20 "Order to Show Cost," is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 01/26/2016. (ATD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Devon E. Phillips, No. CV-14-02809-PHX-GMS (ESW) Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Arizona, State of, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 On December 29, 2014, Petitioner Devon E. Phillips, who was then confined in 17 the Arizona State Prison Complex-Tucson, filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas 18 Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). In a May 8, 2015 Order, the Court 19 dismissed the Petition with leave to amend. (Doc. 8). On August 26, 2015, Petitioner 20 filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 14). The Court ordered 21 Respondents to answer. (Doc. 15). Respondents filed their “Answer to Petition for Writ 22 of Habeas Corpus” on October 19, 2015. (Doc. 19). All issues are joined. Several 23 Motions are pending before the Court. 24 DISCUSSION 25 1. Request to File Only Relevant Portions of the Record (Doc. 18) 26 On September 9, 2015, the Court ordered that “[i]f not limited to affirmative 27 defenses, the answer must fully comply with all of the requirements of Rule 5 of the 28 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.” Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, requires that 1 Respondents must attach to their Answer relevant transcripts as well as briefs on appeal 2 and dispositive appellate orders and opinions. Respondents request leave of the Court to 3 file with their Answer only those parts of the state court record deemed relevant by 4 Respondents. Respondents did not file a limited answer. Therefore, the request will be 5 denied. 6 2. “Order to Show Cost” (Doc. 20) 7 Petitioner seeks a paper copy of the June 22, 2010 change of plea transcript in his 8 underlying state court proceeding. The document the Petitioner requests is attached as 9 Exhibit G to Respondents’ Answer. (Doc. 19-1 at 31- 40). Respondents indicate in their 10 Response to Order to Show “Cost” that a paper copy of the transcript was sent to 11 Petitioner at his Texas address. (Doc. 21). Therefore, Petitioner’s “Order to Show Cost” 12 will be denied as moot. 13 CONCLUSION 14 For the reasons set forth herein, 15 IT IS ORDERED denying Request to File Only Relevant Portions of the Record 16 (Doc. 18). Respondents shall file all documents in compliance with Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. 17 foll. § 2254 no later than February 5, 2016. Petitioner may file a reply no later than 18 March 7, 2016. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot “Order to Show Cost” (Doc. 20). 20 Dated this 26th day of January, 2016. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?