Henderson #280969 v. Ryan et al
ORDER Magistrate Judge Metcalf's R&R (Doc. 31 ) is accepted. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Gov erning Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. SeeSlack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/13/2015. (KMG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Tommie Lee Henderson,
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”). Docs. 1, 31. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss the Petition
without prejudice. Doc. 31 at 18. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had
fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could
be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 18 (citing Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-
taken. The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in
whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ.
P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended
disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with
IT IS ORDERED:
Magistrate Judge Metcalf’s R&R (Doc. 31) is accepted.
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed
The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.
Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the
event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability
because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Dated this 13th day of November, 2015.
Honorable G. Murray Snow
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?