Mitchell v. Scottsdale, City of

Filing 7

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall give the City of Scottsdale a copy of this Order. Plaintiff shall file an affidavit describing the details of this service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Scottsdale shall, within ten (10) days from the date on which it receives a copy of this Order, file a response to 4 Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/14/2015. (TLB)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Howard Lee Mitchell,
Plaintiff,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-15-00637-PHX-JAT

City of Scottsdale,

13

Defendant.

14
15

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion/Request for

16

Emergency Injunction Secondary to Complaint” (Doc. 4). Plaintiff requests in this

17

document that the Court issue a preliminary injunction requiring Defendant and any other

18

custodians of his animals to “retain and provide proper care” during the duration of the

19

present case. (Doc. 4 at 5). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 65 governs the

20

issuance of preliminary injunctions, and states that “[t]he court may issue a preliminary

21

injunction only on notice to the adverse party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1).

22

Plaintiff has filed a proof of service form with the Court that states, under penalty

23

of perjury, that he has served a summons on the City of Scottsdale. (Doc. 5). The Court

24

notes that Plaintiff’s actions do not qualify as proper service under the Federal Rules of

25

Civil Procedure because a party to an action may not serve a summons and complaint.

26

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). Nevertheless, the rules for a preliminary injunction require

27

only notice, not service. Because the City of Scottsdale must have notice and an

28

opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court will

1

order Plaintiff to give a copy of this Order to the City of Scottsdale.

2

Plaintiff has not, however, provided notice to the other party sought to be

3

enjoined, the Arizona Humane Society. See Parker v. Ryan, 960 F.2d 543, 545 (5th Cir.

4

1992) (“When dealing with a preliminary injunction, the ‘adverse party’ means the party

5

adversely affected by the injunction, not the opponent in the underlying action.”); see

6

also Washington v. Wa. State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658,

7

692 n.32 (1979). Therefore, unless Plaintiff also gives notice to the Arizona Humane

8

Society and provides them with a copy of this Order, the Arizona Humane Society cannot

9

be the subject of an injunction.

10

For the foregoing reasons,

11

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall give the City of Scottsdale a copy of this

12

Order. Plaintiff shall file an affidavit describing the details of this service.

13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Scottsdale shall, within ten days

14

from the date on which it receives a copy of this Order, file a response to Plaintiff’s

15

motion for a preliminary injunction.

16

Dated this 14th day of April, 2015.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-