Borggreen #133582 v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED adopting the 22 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing it wit h prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/7/16. (KGM)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
David Alan Borggreen,
Charles L Ryan, et al.,
Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
15 2254 on May 20, 2015 raising two grounds for relief: 1) that his term of supervision after
16 the completion of his sentence violates his rights to equal protection and to be free from
17 double jeopardy; and 2) the trial court illegally changed his term of probation from
18 concurrent to consecutive. Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for
19 Writ of Habeas Corpus on May 5, 2016. Petitioner filed his reply on May 26, 2016. On
20 June 14, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation
21 recommending that the petition be denied.
In hes Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that
23 they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and
24 Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time
25 to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation
26 have been filed.
The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the
IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge as the order of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
and dismissing it with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave
to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
Dated this 7th day of July, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?