Nance v. Ryan et al

Filing 11

ORDER Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial f iling fee. The Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint wi thin 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 7/27/2015. (KMG)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 Keith Preston Nance, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CV 15-0923-PHX-SMM (DKD) v. ORDER Charles L. Ryan, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Keith Preston Nance, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison 18 Complex, South Unit, in Florence, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 20 1, 2.) The Court will dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to 21 amend. 22 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 23 24 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 25 The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. Id. The statutory filing fee will be 26 collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to 27 Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. 28 JDDL-K Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government 1 agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula. 2 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 3 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 4 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 5 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 6 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon 7 which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is 8 immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2). 9 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 10 pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 11 does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the- 12 defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” 13 (2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere 14 conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 15 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 16 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 17 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual 18 content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable 19 for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible 20 claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw 21 on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s 22 specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must 23 assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. 24 at 681. 25 26 courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 27 342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less 28 JDDL-K But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. -2- 1 Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 2 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other 3 facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal 4 of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 5 Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may 6 possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend. 7 III. Complaint 8 Plaintiff alleges two counts for violation of equal protection and 42 U.S.C. 9 §§ 1997 and 2000.1 Plaintiff sues the following current or former employees of the 10 Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC): Director Charles Ryan; Florence Complex 11 Warden Greg Fizer; Deputy Warden Jack Heet; and Corrections Officer (CO) II Thomas 12 Crean, a grievance coordinator. Plaintiff seeks injunctive, compensatory, and punitive 13 relief. 14 Plaintiff alleges the following facts in his Complaint: Plaintiff is African- 15 American. In the South Unit chow hall, inmates are allowed to sit where they choose, but 16 they choose to sit in groups segregated by race. Otherwise at South Unit, inmates are 17 bunked, socialize, and attend worship services without regard to race. According to 18 Plaintiff, if he sat at “a white, Mexican, or Native American table,” he would be 19 subjected to a “beat down,” i.e., an assault by other inmates. (Doc. 1 at 3f.) Plaintiff 20 contends that Defendants have allowed a custom of racially segregated seating in the 21 South Unit chow hall, in violation of equal protection and §§ 1997 and 2000. 22 On January 19, 2015, Plaintiff forwarded a letter to Defendant Heet seeking a 23 mission statement denouncing segregation of inmates at meals based on race. On January 24 27, 2015, Plaintiff met with Heet and Crean about his concerns. 25 investigate. Heet agreed to 26 27 28 1 him. JDDL-K In his Complaint, Plaintiff references exhibits, but no exhibits were submitted by -3- 1 On February 28, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an informal resolution to Defendant 2 Crean concerning the issue. On March 5, 2015, Crean found the grievance resolved 3 based on a response sent on March 4, 2015. On March 9, 2015, Plaintiff submitted a 4 formal grievance to Heet because he had not received a resolution to his complaint. On 5 March 11, 2015, Crean responded to the grievance stating that after investigation and 6 conducting interviews, he found that South Unit did not promote, facilitate, or encourage 7 segregation in the chow hall and denied the grievance. 8 On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff submitted a grievance appeal to Warden Fizer. In an 9 April 8, 2015 response, Fizer affirmed denial of the grievance because ADC did not 10 enforce or encourage segregation in the chow hall and ADC already had a zero tolerance 11 stance against discrimination based on race. 12 On April 13, 2015, Plaintiff submitted his final grievance appeal to Ryan. On 13 April 27, 2015, Ryan affirmed the denial of Plaintiff’s grievance appeal. Ryan agreed 14 that ADC had a zero tolerance stance towards racial discrimination. Ryan noted that 15 there was no assigned seating in the Unit chow hall and that inmates could choose to sit 16 where they wanted. 17 In an April 24, 2015 Unit newsletter, an unnamed inmate asked Heet what legacy 18 he wished to leave at the South Unit, to which Heet replied that he would like to have the 19 chow hall integrated. At an April 27, 2015 South Unit Community Meeting, Heet and 20 inmates discussed integration of the Unit chow hall, but “no course of action was 21 determined nor policy or custom change.” (Doc. 1 at 3G.) In an April 28, 2015 22 newsletter, Heet stated that he was not trying to enforce integration, but that he wanted 23 every inmate to feel free to sit with whomever he chose at meals. 24 IV. Failure to State a Claim 25 26 (2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities 27 and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th 28 JDDL-K To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d -4- 1 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific 2 injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an 3 affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 4 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 5 A. 6 Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim for violation of equal protection. The Equal 7 Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that a state may not “deny to 8 any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,” which is essentially a 9 direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike. U.S. Const., amend. 10 XIV; see City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439 (1985). A 11 state practice that interferes with a fundamental right or that discriminates against a 12 suspect class of individuals is subject to strict scrutiny. Massachusetts Bd. of Ret. v. 13 Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 (1976); City of Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 441. Thus, in Johnson 14 v. California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005), the Supreme Court held that racial classifications in 15 prisons are “immediately suspect” and subject to strict scrutiny, even where such policies 16 affect all races equally. 543 U.S. at 508-09. Absent allegations that he is a member of a 17 suspect class, or that a fundamental right has been violated, a plaintiff must allege facts to 18 support that he has been intentionally treated differently from others who are similarly 19 situated without a reasonable basis therefor. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 20 U.S. 562, 564 (2000). Conclusory allegations do not suffice. See Village of Arlington 21 Heights v. Metropolitan Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 265 (1977). Count I 22 23 However, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that any Defendant has mandated or 24 required inmates to sit in racially segregated groups in the chow hall. Rather, Plaintiff 25 asserts that Defendants allow or tolerate inmates choosing to segregate themselves by 26 race in the chow hall. Plaintiff acknowledges that he may sit where he chooses, but 27 speculates that if he sat with inmates of a different race in the chow hall, he would be 28 JDDL-K Plaintiff alleges that he is African American, a member of a suspect class. physically attacked. Plaintiff does not allege facts to support that he has ever done so, -5- 1 that any Defendant has prevented him from doing so, or that he has ever been attacked 2 for doing so. Instead, Plaintiff appears to seek forced integration in the chow hall by 3 Defendants, while acknowledging that in all other activities, the races are integrated. 4 Allowing inmates to sit where and with whom they choose in the chow hall, absent other 5 facts, does not rise to the level of an equal protection violation. Accordingly, Plaintiff 6 fails to state a claim in Count I and it will be dismissed. 7 B. 8 Plaintiff designates Count II as a claim for violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1997 and 9 2000a premised on the same facts asserted in support of Count I. While § 1997e allows a 10 prisoner to file suit if he has complied with available administrative remedies, it does not 11 afford a substantive basis for relief. Indeed, it authorizes a court to dismiss a prisoner suit 12 sua sponte if the prisoner fails to state a claim under § 1983, among other reasons. As 13 discussed above, Plaintiff has failed to state a substantive claim in Count I. The same 14 facts alleged in support of Plaintiff’s equal protection claim do not otherwise state a claim 15 under § 1997. Accordingly, this portion of Count II will be dismissed. Count II 16 17 accommodation, such as hotels, motels, restaurants, gas stations, bus lines, and 18 entertainment venues, open to the public. 42 U.S.C. § 2000a(b). The Court has found no 19 authority to support that state prisons constitute places of public accommodation. 20 Further, state action for purposes of § 2000a(d) means discrimination or segregation 21 carried on (1) under color of any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation, (2) carried on 22 under color of any custom, or usage required or enforced by officials of the state, or (3) 23 required by action of the state. 42 U.S.C. § 2000a(d). Further, § 2000a authorizes the 24 Attorney General to initiate suit. Plaintiff has not alleged facts to support any of these 25 requirements. For the above reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim under § 2000a. This 26 portion of Count II will be dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff cannot amend to 27 state a claim under § 2000a. 28 JDDL-K Section 2000a prohibits discrimination or segregation in places of public / / / -6- 1 V. Leave to Amend 2 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to 3 state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a 4 first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will 5 mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If 6 Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended 7 complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 8 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 9 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 10 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 11 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 12 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 13 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 14 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original 15 complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised 16 in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without 17 prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa 18 County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 19 VI. Warnings 20 A. 21 If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not 22 been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court 23 that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or 24 (2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may 25 result in dismissal of this action. Release 26 27 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with 28 JDDL-K B. Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion Address Changes -7- 1 for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 2 dismissal of this action. 3 C. 4 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 5 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further 6 notice to Plaintiff. Copies 7 D. 8 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff 9 fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 10 dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 11 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 12 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more 13 prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 14 in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, 15 malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner 16 is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Possible “Strike” 17 E. 18 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 19 these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 20 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 21 order of the Court). 22 IT IS ORDERED: Possible Dismissal 23 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 24 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government 25 agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial 26 filing fee. 27 (3) 28 JDDL-K The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in -8- 1 2 compliance with this Order. (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 3 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with 4 prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 5 6 7 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. DATED this 27th day of July, 2015. 8 9 10 Honorable Stephen M. McNamee Senior United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K -9- Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 3/9/07 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ) , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: at . The first Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: at . The second Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: at . The third Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?