Green #275635 v. Ryan et al

Filing 16

ORDER that 15 First Amended Complaint filed by Anthony Roman Green is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/13/15. (EJA)

1
2

MH

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Anthony Roman Green,

10
11
12

No. CV 15-00999-PHX-DGC (MHB)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

Charles Ryan, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On June 1, 2015, Plaintiff Anthony Roman Green, who is confined in the Arizona

16

State Prison Complex (ASPC)-Eyman, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On June 17, 2015, the

18

Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed as deficient and

19

granting him 30 days to either pay the required filing and administrative fees or file a

20

complete in forma pauperis application.

21

deficient Application to Proceed, which was denied by the Court in an Order dated

22

August 10, 2015. On August 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed another Application to Proceed In

23

Forma Pauperis.

24

Application to Proceed and dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff

25

was given 30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in

26

the Order.

27
28
JDDL-K

On July 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a second

In a September 11, 2015 Order, the Court granted Plaintiff’s

1

On September 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (Doc. 15).

2

The Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend.

3

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

4

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

5

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28

6

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff

7

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon

8

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is

9

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2).

10

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

11

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8

12

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-

13

defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”

14

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere

15

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

16

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

17

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

18

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual

19

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable

20

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible

21

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw

22

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s

23

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must

24

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

25

at 681.

26

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,

27

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

28

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less
JDDL-K

-2-

1

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.

2

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).

3

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other

4

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal

5

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc).

6

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but

7

because it may possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave

8

to amend.

9

II.

First Amended Complaint

10

Plaintiff asserts one count in his First Amended Complaint, alleging due process

11

violations associated with a prison disciplinary proceeding. He names Charles Ryan, the

12

Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC); J. O’Neil, the Complex-

13

Warden at ASPC-Eyman; Disciplinary Hearing Officer B. Schitter; and Disciplinary

14

Coordinator A. Durazo as Defendants. Plaintiff seeks court costs and injunctive relief.

15

Plaintiff’s allegations center on a prison disciplinary proceeding that, according to

16

him, was based on “false accusations” and was conducted “without proper due process.”

17

(Doc. 15 at 3.) As a result of this proceeding, Plaintiff allegedly received a 2-year

18

extension on lockdown. (Id.)

19

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant O’Neil, in “an act of bias,” moved Plaintiff to a

20

higher lockdown level before the disciplinary investigation was completed, thereby

21

placing him in an environment that made it difficult to “approach and defend [his]

22

innocence.” (Id. at 3-4.)

23

Defendant Schitter, who conducted Plaintiff’s disciplinary hearing, was “set on

24

finding [Plaintiff] guilty,” according to the allegations in the First Amended Complaint.

25

(Id at 4.) Schitter allegedly refused to show Plaintiff evidence presented against him,

26

prevented Plaintiff from presenting his “side of the story,” and denied Plaintiff’s request

27

for staff assistance and witness statements. (Id.) “Nothing was processed in a timely

28
JDDL-K

-3-

1

manner [or] done correctly,” Plaintiff claims, and Schitter was “unable to be fair and

2

impartial,” when presiding over the hearing. (Id.)

3

Defendant Durazo allegedly failed to process Plaintiff’s appeals from Schitter’s

4

disciplinary findings. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff alleges that he “submitted multiple inmate

5

letters inquiring about updates and where the process . . . stood . . . only to find out after

6

expiration of appeal timeframe that [his] appeal was never processed.” (Id.)

7

When Plaintiff submitted a “Second Level Appeal to Director [Ryan],” the appeal

8

was “reviewed with no consideration for the obvious ‘due process’ violations.” (Id. at 3.)

9

In addition, Plaintiff alleges, as the individual “responsible for managing staff within

10

ADC, . . . Charles Ryan is subject to being responsible for their violations as ADC

11

employees.”

12

III.

Failure to State a Claim

13

To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants

14

(2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities

15

and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th

16

Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d

17

1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific

18

injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an

19

affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode,

20

423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). There is no respondeat superior liability under

21

§ 1983, and therefore, a defendant’s position as the supervisor of persons who allegedly

22

violated Plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not impose liability. Monell v. New York

23

City Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691-92 (1978); Hamilton v. Endell, 981 F.2d

24

1062, 1067 (9th Cir. 1992); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989).

25

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,

26

520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey

27

v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a

28

liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the
JDDL-K

-4-

1

claim that were not initially pled. Id.

2

Plaintiff asserts that he was denied due process in connection with disciplinary

3

proceedings. In analyzing a due process claim, the Court must first decide whether

4

Plaintiff was entitled to any process, and if so, whether he was denied any

5

constitutionally required procedural safeguard. Liberty interests that entitle an inmate to

6

due process are “generally limited to freedom from restraint which, while not exceeding

7

the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due

8

Process Clause of its own force, nonetheless imposes atypical and significant hardship on

9

the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Sandin v. Conner, 515

10

U.S. 472, 484 (1995) (internal citations omitted).

11

To determine whether an inmate is entitled to the procedural protections afforded

12

by the Due Process Clause, the Court must look to the particular restrictions imposed and

13

ask whether they “‘present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a state

14

might conceivably create a liberty interest.’” Mujahid v. Meyer, 59 F.3d 931, 932 (9th

15

Cir. 1995) (quoting Sandin, 515 U.S. at 486). “Atypicality” requires not merely an

16

empirical comparison, but turns on the importance of the right taken away from the

17

prisoner. See Carlo v. City of Chino, 105 F.3d 493, 499 (9th Cir. 1997). To determine

18

whether the sanctions impose an atypical and a significant hardship, courts look to the

19

prisoner’s conditions of confinement, the duration of the sanction, and whether the

20

sanction will affect the duration of the prisoner’s sentence. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334

21

F.3d 850, 861 (9th Cir. 2003); Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1088-89 (9th Cir. 1996).

22

As in his original Complaint, Plaintiff’s allegations fail to state a claim based on

23

an atypical or significant hardship. Plaintiff alleges that he received a 2-year extension of

24

lockdown. It is not clear from the First Amended Complaintwhether such punishment

25

constitutes an atypical and significant hardship, however, as Plaintiff has failed to

26

describe the specific conditions of his confinement, such as the amount of recreation he is

27

permitted per day, the frequency of visitation, his access to libraries and religious

28

worship, his educational and vocational opportunities, and the availability for review of
JDDL-K

-5-

1

his confinement status. . In the absence of , such information, the court cannot conclude

2

that the conditions of Plaintiff’s disciplinary confinement implicate a liberty interest

3

under the Fourteenth Amendment. See Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484.

4

Even assuming a protected liberty interest was implicated, however, Plaintiff has

5

failed to allege a cognizable due process violation. “Prison disciplinary proceedings are

6

not part of a criminal prosecution, and the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such

7

proceedings does not apply.” Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556 (1974). Procedural

8

due process safeguards in a prison disciplinary hearing require that the defendant receive:

9

(1) written notice of the charges, no less than twenty-four hours prior to the hearing; (2) a

10

written statement by the fact-finder as to the evidence relied on and reasons for the

11

disciplinary action and (3) a limited right to call witnesses and present documentary

12

evidence when it would not be unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional

13

goals to allow the defendant to do so. Id. at 565-66.

14

Although Plaintiff alleges generally that “[n]othing was . . . done correctly,” he

15

does not allege that any of the foregoing procedural safeguards were absent. He does not

16

contend that he was unaware of the evidence presented against him, only that he was not

17

permitted to “see” all of it. (Doc. 15 at 4.) And while he alleges that he was unable to

18

present his “side of the story,” and that a request for unspecified witness statements was

19

denied, id., it does not appear from the allegations in the First Amended Complaint that

20

Plaintiff was wholly precluded from presenting testimony or documentary evidence.

21

Absent additional facts demonstrating that he was denied his “limited right to call

22

witnesses and present documentary evidence,” Plaintiff cannot state a due process claim.

23

See Wolff, 418 U.S. at 565-66. Accordingly, Count One of the First Amended Complaint

24

will be dismissed without prejudice.

25

IV.

Leave to Amend

26

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed

27

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff

28

may submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The
JDDL-K

-6-

1

Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second

2

amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may

3

strike the second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to

4

Plaintiff.

5

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second

6

Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in

7

its entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

8

Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one

9

claim per count.

10

A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First

11

Amended Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal

12

Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After

13

amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as

14

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the

15

original complaint or first amended complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was

16

dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a second amended complaint.

17

Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

18

V.

Warnings

19

A.

20

If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not

21

been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court

22

that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or

23

(2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may

24

result in dismissal of this action.

Release

25

B.

26

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with

27

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion

Address Changes

28
JDDL-K

-7-

1

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in

2

dismissal of this action.

3

C.

4

Because Plaintiff is currently confined in an Arizona Department of Corrections

5

unit subject to General Order 14-17, Plaintiff is not required to submit an additional copy

6

of every filing for use by the Court, as would ordinarily be required by Local Rule of

7

Civil Procedure 5.4. If Plaintiff is transferred to a unit other than one subject to General

8

Order 14-17, he will be notified of the requirements regarding copies for the Court that

9

are required for inmates whose cases are not subject to General Order 14-17.

Copies

10

D.

11

Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a

12

claim, if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies

13

identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes”

14

provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring

15

a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the

16

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,

17

brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the

18

grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

19

granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28

20

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Possible “Strike”

21

E.

22

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including

23

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963

24

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any

25

order of the Court).

Possible Dismissal

26
27
28
JDDL-K

-8-

1
2

IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 15) is dismissed for failure to state a

3

claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended

4

complaint in compliance with this Order.

5

(2)

If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the

6

Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action

7

with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.

8

§ 1915(g).

9

(3)

10
11

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a

civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
Dated this 13th day of October, 2015.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should
not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction
or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a
person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file
a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions
must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may
attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.
You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do
not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which
may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a
material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee
plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave
to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of
any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you
wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to
the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when
your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in
Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined
in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you
were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson
Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and
administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 5/1/2013

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any
change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing
address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit
to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each
original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must
include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the
document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may
be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you
must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved
civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of
Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After
any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a
proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate
by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants
not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are
subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take
additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,
the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or
oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of
any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading
or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address
on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name
more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the
words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all
of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in
the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may
result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking
only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for
federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you
were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.
If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each
additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the
page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege
three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you
must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number
the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that
you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation
of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you
must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state
the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual
defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify
which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)
occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should
disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative
appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for
any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the
complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring
an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint
being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the
form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form
must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to
identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
)
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 5/1/2013

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:

. The first Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
2.

(Institution)
. The second Defendant is employed as:

Name of second Defendant:
at

.

(Position and Title)
3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:

. The third Defendant is employed as:
at

.

(Position and Title)
4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at
(Position and Title)

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each
Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal
authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your
G Yes G No
institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you
did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach
no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you
attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

6