Herrera v. Arpaio et al

Filing 5

ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. The Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffhas 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 08/19/2015. (REK)

Download PDF
1 2 SC WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 Carlos Herrera, 12 13 14 No. CV 15-1285-PHX-DGC (JZB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Carlos Herrera, who is confined in the Durango Jail in Phoenix, Arizona, 17 18 has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an 19 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will dismiss the 20 Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to amend. 21 I. 22 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 24 The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $13.14. The remainder of the fee will 25 be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to 26 Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government 28 agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula. JDDL-K 1 II. 2 Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 3 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 4 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 5 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon 6 which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is 7 immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2). 8 9 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 10 does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the- 11 defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 12 (2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere 13 conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. 14 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 15 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 16 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual 17 content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable 18 for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible 19 claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw 20 on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s 21 specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must 22 assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. 23 at 681. 24 But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, 25 courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 26 342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less 27 stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. 28 Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). JDDL-K -2- 1 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other 2 facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal 3 of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 4 Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may 5 possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend. 6 III. 7 Complaint Plaintiff asserts five counts for the denial of basic necessities. Plaintiff sues 8 Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, unspecified Maricopa County Sheriff’s 9 Office (MCSO) officers, and Maricopa County. Plaintiff seeks compensatory relief. 10 Plaintiff alleges the following in his Complaint: Defendants have housed Plaintiff 11 in buildings containing or exposing him to toxic materials, including asbestos, which he 12 contends is flaking and friable (Count I). Defendants placed Plaintiff in a holding cell at 13 an intake facility with so many other inmates that he could not sit down without touching 14 other inmates (Count II). Defendants failed to provide a proper diet for Plaintiff’s 15 medical condition, diverticulitis, on several occasions, which resulted in him receiving 16 antibiotics (Count III). Defendants placed him in a pod containing fifteen cells designed 17 to hold two inmates each, but sixty inmates were confined in the pod or approximately 18 double the intended number, which prevented Plaintiff from being able to sit and eat 19 meals (Count IV). Defendants housed Plaintiff in a pod with only two showers and two 20 toilets for sixty inmates, which impeded Plaintiff’s ability to use the restroom when 21 needed. 22 IV. 23 Failure to State a Claim To prevail in a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must show that (1) acts by the defendants 24 (2) under color of state law (3) deprived him of federal rights, privileges or immunities 25 and (4) caused him damage. Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th 26 Cir. 2005) (quoting Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Idaho Fish & Game Comm’n, 42 F.3d 27 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 1994)). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific 28 injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an JDDL-K -3- 1 affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 2 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 3 Further, to state a claim against a defendant, “[a] plaintiff must allege facts, not 4 simply conclusions [to] show that an individual was personally involved in the 5 deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 6 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege 7 injuries resulting from a policy, practice, or custom of the agency over which that 8 individual has final policy-making authority. See Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 9 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2002). Further, there is no respondeat superior liability under 10 §1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone who allegedly violated a 11 plaintiff’s constitutional rights, absent more, does not make him liable. Monell v. Dep’t 12 of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 13 1989). A supervisor in his personal capacity “is only liable for constitutional violations 14 of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of 15 the violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045. In addition, 16 where a defendant’s only involvement in allegedly unconstitutional conduct is the denial 17 of administrative grievances, the failure to intervene on a prisoner’s behalf to remedy the 18 alleged unconstitutional behavior does not amount to active unconstitutional behavior for 19 purposes of § 1983. See Shehee v. Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999); accord 20 Proctor v. Applegate, 661 F.Supp.2d 743, 765 (W.D. Mich. 2009); Stocker v. Warden, 21 No. 1:07-CV-00589, 2009 WL 981323, at *10 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2009); Mintun v. 22 Blades, No. CV-06-139, 2008 WL 711636, at *7 (D. Idaho Mar. 14, 2008); see also 23 Gregory v. City of Louisville, 444 F.3d 725, 751 (6th Cir. 2006) (a plaintiff must allege 24 that a supervisor defendant did more than play a passive role in an alleged violation or 25 mere tacit approval thereof; a plaintiff must allege that the supervisor defendant somehow 26 encouraged or condoned the actions of their subordinates). 27 A. 28 Plaintiff asserts that, in addition to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, this Court has jurisdiction Graves v. Arpaio JDDL-K -4- 1 pursuant to Graves v. Arpaio, CV 77-00479-PHX-NVW, formerly Hart v. Hill (D. Ariz.). 2 However, Plaintiff may not enforce the decrees entered in Graves in a separate civil 3 rights action. See Cagle v. Sutherland, 334 F.3d 980, 986 (11th Cir. 2003); Klein v. 4 Zavaras, 80 F.3d 432, 435 (10th Cir. 1996); DeGidio v. Pung, 920 F.2d 525, 534 (8th 5 Cir.1990); Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 1116, 1122-23 (5th Cir. 1986). Moreover, 6 standing alone, remedial orders, such as those entered in Graves, cannot serve as a 7 substantive basis for a § 1983 claim for damages because such orders do not create 8 “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.” Green, 788 F.3d 9 at 1123-24. Rather, remedial decrees are the means by which unconstitutional conditions 10 are corrected. Id. at 1123. Accordingly, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant 11 to Graves in this action, Plaintiff fails to state a claim. 12 B. Unspecified MCSO Officers 13 Plaintiff purports to sue unspecified MCSO officers. Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules 14 of Civil Procedure requires the plaintiff to include the names of the parties in the action. 15 As a practical matter, it is impossible in most instances for the United States Marshal or 16 his designee to serve a summons and complaint or amended complaint upon an 17 anonymous defendant. 18 The Ninth Circuit has held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing of a 19 complaint, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the 20 unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or 21 that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 22 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 23 1980)). Where the names of individual defendants are unknown at the time a complaint 24 is filed, a plaintiff may refer to the individual unknown defendants as Defendant John (or 25 Jane) Doe 1, John Doe 2, and so on, and allege facts to support how each particular Doe 26 defendant violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. A plaintiff may thereafter use the 27 discovery process to obtain the names of fictitiously-named defendants whom he believes 28 violated his constitutional rights and seek leave to amend to name those defendants. JDDL-K -5- 1 As discussed herein, Plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint 2 in which he should name as Defendants the person(s) who allegedly violated his 3 constitutional rights. If Plaintiff does not know the names of those person(s), Plaintiff 4 may refer to each such person by a fictitious name, e.g., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, and so 5 on and allege facts to support how each defendant violated his constitutional rights. That 6 is, Plaintiff must allege when, where, and how any Doe defendant violated his 7 constitutional rights. 8 C. 9 Plaintiff sues Maricopa County. A municipality is a “person” for purposes of Maricopa County 10 § 1983, which may be sued under § 1983. See Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics 11 Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 166 (1993); Monell, 436 U.S. at 694. 12 To state a claim against a municipality under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts to 13 support that his constitutional rights were violated pursuant to a policy or custom of the 14 municipality. Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001) 15 (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91); Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, 885 F.2d 1439, 16 1443 (9th Cir. 1989)). Thus, a municipality may not be sued solely because an injury 17 was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 18 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, a § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant 19 “cannot succeed as a matter of law” unless a plaintiff: (1) contends that the municipal 20 defendant maintains a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury; and (2) 21 explains how such policy or custom caused the plaintiff’s injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 22 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant 23 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). 24 Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that Maricopa County maintained a policy 25 or custom that resulted in the violation of Plaintiff’s federal constitutional rights or to 26 explain how his injuries were caused by any County policy or custom. Accordingly, 27 Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Maricopa County and it will be dismissed. 28 / / / JDDL-K -6- 1 D. 2 Plaintiff’s claims concern conditions of confinement at the Durango Jail. Plaintiff Conditions of Confinement/Basic Necessities 3 does not allege when or for how long he was confined in the Durango Jail or whether he 4 was a pretrial detainee, convicted inmate, or both at relevant times. 5 A pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises 6 from the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause while a convicted inmate’s claim 7 arises under the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. 8 Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 n.16 (1979). Nevertheless, the same standards are 9 applied. See Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted). To 10 state a claim for unconstitutional conditions, a plaintiff must allege an objectively 11 “sufficiently serious” deprivation that results in the denial of “the minimal civilized 12 measure of life’s necessities.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994); Allen v. 13 Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082, 1087 (9th Cir. 1994); see Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer, 301 14 F.3d 1043, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002). That is, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that 15 he is incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm. Farmer, 511 U.S. 16 at 834. “The circumstances, nature, and duration of a deprivation of [ ] necessities must 17 be considered in determining whether a constitutional violation has occurred.” Hearns v. 18 Terhune, 413 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 19 731 (9th Cir. 2000)). Further, whether a condition of confinement rises to the level of a 20 constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the duration of an inmate’s exposure to 21 that condition. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. 22 Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978)). In addition, allegations of overcrowding, alone, 23 are insufficient to state a claim. See Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 348 (1981). 24 When, however, overcrowding causes an increase in violence or reduces the provision of 25 other constitutionally required services, or reaches a level where the institution is no 26 longer fit for human habitation, the inmate’s right against cruel and unusual punishment 27 may be violated. See Balla v. Idaho State Bd. of Corr., 869 F.2d 461, 471 (9th Cir. 28 1989); Toussaint v. Yockey, 722 F.2d 1490, 1492 (9th Cir. 1984). JDDL-K -7- 1 A plaintiff must also allege facts to support that a defendant acted with deliberate 2 indifference. Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of 3 ordinary due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. To state a claim of 4 deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must meet a two-part test. First, the alleged 5 constitutional deprivation must be, objectively, “sufficiently serious”; the official’s act or 6 omission must result in the denial of “the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” 7 Id. at 834 (citations omitted). Second, the prison official must have a “sufficiently 8 culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with deliberate indifference to inmate health or 9 safety. Id. (citations omitted). In defining “deliberate indifference” in this context, the 10 Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the official must both be aware of facts 11 from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, 12 and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at 837 (emphasis added). 13 Plaintiff does not allege for how long he was confined in the Durango Jail or the 14 frequency or duration of his exposure to the complained of conditions. Instead, he recites 15 the standard to state a claim for unconstitutional conditions, i.e., deliberate indifference to 16 an excessive risk, without alleging facts to connect any Defendant to those conditions or 17 Plaintiff’s exposure to those conditions. For example, Plaintiff alleges that he suffered 18 bouts of diverticulitis, which he attributes to sometimes not receiving the proper medical 19 diet, but he fails to allege facts to support when and how any Defendant allegedly caused 20 him not to receive the proper meal. Indeed, such errors appear to have been nothing more 21 than inadvertent or negligent. Negligence is not sufficient to state a claim. Moreover, 22 Plaintiff acknowledges that he received medical treatment for diverticulitis. In short, 23 while Plaintiff recites the standard in each count, he fails to allege facts to support that 24 any Defendant acted with deliberate indifference to those conditions. Accordingly, 25 Plaintiff fails to state a claim for unconstitutional conditions. 26 V. 27 28 Leave to Amend For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a JDDL-K -8- 1 first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will 2 mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If 3 Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended 4 complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 5 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 6 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 7 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 8 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 9 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 10 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 11 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original 12 complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised 13 in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without 14 prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa 15 County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 16 VI. Warnings 17 A. 18 If Plaintiff is released while this case remains pending, and the filing fee has not Release 19 been paid in full, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of his release, either (1) notify the Court 20 that he intends to pay the unpaid balance of his filing fee within 120 days of his release or 21 (2) file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply may 22 result in dismissal of this action. 23 B. 24 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Address Changes 25 Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion 26 for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 27 dismissal of this action. 28 / / / JDDL-K -9- 1 C. 2 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See Copies 3 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further 4 notice to Plaintiff. 5 D. 6 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff Possible “Strike” 7 fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 8 dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 9 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 10 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more 11 prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 12 in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, 13 malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner 14 is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 15 E. 16 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including Possible Dismissal 17 these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 18 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 19 order of the Court). 20 IT IS ORDERED: 21 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 22 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government 23 agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing 24 fee of $13.14. 25 (3) The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff 26 has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in 27 compliance with this Order. 28 (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of JDDL-K - 10 - 1 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with 2 prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3 4 5 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Dated this 19th day of August, 2015. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K - 11 - Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 5/1/2013 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 5/1/2013 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as: at . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) . The second Defendant is employed as: Name of second Defendant: at . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as: at . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at (Position and Title) . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your G Yes G No institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your G Yes G No institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?