Contreras-Ramirez v. USA
Filing
34
ORDER - Magistrate Judge Bade's 33 R&R is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this action and enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of t he Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/20/2017. (ATD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Rodrigo Contreras-Ramirez,
Petitioner,
10
No. CV-15-01692-PHX-GMS
No. CR-13-01001-PHX-GMS
ORDER
11
v.
12
United States of America,
13
Respondent.
14
15
Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct
16
Sentence, (Doc. 1), and United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade’s Report and
17
Recommendation (“R&R”), (Doc. 33). The R&R recommends that the Court deny the
18
Motion, (Doc. 33 at 5). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen
19
days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be
20
considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 6 (citing 28
21
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
22
1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
23
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
24
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
25
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
26
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
27
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
28
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-
1
taken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
2
(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
3
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The
4
district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further
5
evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
7
1.
Magistrate Judge Bade’s R&R (Doc. 33) is ACCEPTED.
8
2.
Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, (Doc. 1), is
9
10
11
DENIED.
3.
The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this action and enter judgment
12
accordingly.
4.
Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the
13
event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability
14
because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See
15
16
17
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Dated this 20th day of September, 2017.
18
19
20
Honorable G. Murray Snow
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?