Muktadir v. Donahue

Filing 15

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13 ) is REJECTED because Petitioner has been removed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 03-30-16. (GAR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Iqbal Mohammad Muktadir, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-15-02009-PHX-ROS Michael J. Donahue, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 On March 30, 2015, Petitioner was ordered removed to Bangladesh. (Doc. 13 at 17 2). The Department of Homeland Security continued to detain Petitioner while it made 18 the arrangements for his removal. (Id. at 2-3). On October 7, 2015, Petitioner filed a 19 Petition for habeas relief under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), arguing he had 20 been detained more than six months beyond his removal date and his removal was not 21 significantly likely to occur in the foreseeable future. (Doc, 1). 22 On February 1, 2016, Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade issued a Report and 23 Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 24 13). Petitioner did not file any objections but, on March 21, 2016, the Government 25 informed the Court that Petitioner had been removed on February 22, 2016. (Doc. 14-1). 26 Thus, the petition was now moot. 27 Accordingly, 28 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is REJECTED 1 2 3 4 because Petitioner has been removed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall close this case. Dated this 30th day of March, 2016. 5 6 7 Honorable Roslyn O. Silver Senior United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?