Salazar #207963 v. Ryan et al
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Boyle's R&R, Doc. 16 , is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. 1 , is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable, and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/6/2016. (KMG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Marco Antonio Salazar,
Charles L Ryan, et al.,
Before the Court is Petitioner Marco A. Salazar’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus and United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle’s Report and Recommendation
(R&R). Docs. 1, 16. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition. Doc. 16 at
5. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections
to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the
right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 6 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d
at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . .
require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate
judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless
reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R and
Petitioner did not file objections,
deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the
magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify
the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the
magistrate judge with instructions.”).
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Boyle’s R&R, Doc. 16, is ACCEPTED.
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is
justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling
debatable, and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate this
Dated this 6th day of June, 2016.
Douglas L. Rayes
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?