Ben v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendants Limon Hospitality, LLC and Bruce Rahmani show cause by 11/06/15, why this action should not be remanded to the Superior Court. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 10/29/15. (NKS)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
No. CV-15-02123-PHX-NVW
Marshall Ben,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Union Pacific Railroad Company; Limon
Hospitality, LLC; Bruce Rahmani; et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) fails to adequately allege subject matter and
removal jurisdiction.
The Notice of Removal claims the Court has original jurisdiction over the action
under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. But it does not allege the state of principal place of business of
Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. Breitman v. May Co. California, 37 F.3d
562, 564 (9th Cir. 1994). Nor does it allege the identity and citizenship of every member
of Defendant Limon Hospitality, LLC, which it claims is a limited liability company. See
Sonoma Falls Developers, LLC v. Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc., 272 F. Supp. 2d 919,
921-23 (N.D. Cal. 2003).
The Notice of Removal also claims this action may be removed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1441(a). But it does not allege that all Defendants have joined in or consented to the
removal. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A). Nor does it explain how Defendant Union Pacific
Railroad Company can join in the removal now, given that the time to remove appears to
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
have expired. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(B). Nor does it explain how this action can be
removed at all, given that this action appears to be a civil action in a state court against a
railroad arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 et seq. 28
U.S.C. § 1445(a).
These omissions matter because Defendants bear the burden of establishing
federal jurisdiction and the removal statute is strictly construed against removal
jurisdiction. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co., 846 F.2d 1190, 1195 (9th Cir. 1988).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Limon Hospitality, LLC and
Bruce Rahmani show cause by November 6, 2015, why this action should not be
remanded to the Superior Court.
Dated this 29th day of October, 2015.
12
13
14
Neil V. Wake
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?