Hamadicko v. Carter et al
Filing
14
ORDER: The R&R (Doc. 13 ) is accepted. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/04/2016. (REK)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Mbonfal Hamadicko,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV15-2125 PHX DGC (ESW)
Albert Carter, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
15
Petitioner Mbonfal Hamadicko has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Eileen S. Willett has
17
issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be
18
dismissed without prejudice. Doc. 13. No objection has been filed, which relieves the
19
Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.
20
72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
21
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition.
22
IT IS ORDERED:
23
1.
The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted.
24
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed without
prejudice.
25
26
27
28
3.
A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal are denied.
1
4.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.
2
Dated this 4th day of October, 2016.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‐ 2 ‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?