Aguayo v. Colvin
Filing
31
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Lucy M. Aguayo's "Unopposed Petition for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act" (Doc. 30 ) is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $7,668.00 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, this award shall be payable to Plaintiff and is subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 594 (2010). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 12/15/17. (LAD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of the)
)
Social Security Administration,
)
)
Defendant.
)
Lucy M. Aguayo,
CIV 15-2224-PHX-MHB
ORDER
The Court having reviewed Plaintiff’s “Unopposed Petition for Attorney Fees Under
the Equal Access to Justice Act” (Doc. 30),
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Lucy M. Aguayo’s “Unopposed Petition for Attorney
Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act” (Doc. 30) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $7,668.00 pursuant to the
Equal Access to Justice Act;
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, this award shall be payable to Plaintiff and is
22
subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant
23
to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 594 (2010).
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 15th day of December, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?