Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Maleh et al
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees as modified. Plaintiff is awarded $845 in costs and $800 in attorneys' fees. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/29/16.(EJA)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated,
10
Plaintiff,
No. CV-15-02659-PHX-DLR
ORDER
11
v.
12
Mohannad Maleh and Hi-Life Smoke 'N
Lounge LLC,
13
14
Defendants.
15
16
Before the Court is Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotion Inc.’s Motion for Attorney Fees
17
and Costs in the amount of $3,630. (Doc. 19.) Default judgment has been entered
18
against Defendants, and they did not respond to the instant motion. The Court grants the
19
motion and awards a modified amount of costs and fees.
20
The Communications Act of 1934 mandates an award of attorneys’ fees to the
21
prevailing party in an action involving unlawful publication or use of intercepted wire or
22
radio communications.
23
judgment against Defendants and awarded $3,500 in damages in favor of Plaintiff for
24
Defendants’ illegal publication of a televised fight.
25
publication, Plaintiff had exclusive distribution rights to the fight, and is thus entitled to
26
an award of attorneys’ fees and costs as the prevailing “aggrieved party.” 47 U.S.C. §
27
605(e)(3)(B)(iii).
28
47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B)(iii).
The Court entered default
(Doc. 18.)
At the time of
In accordance with LRCiv. 54.2, Plaintiff submitted an itemized statement of the
1
fees incurred in connection with prosecuting this matter. (Doc. 19 at 16-19.) The
2
statement sufficiently sets forth a description of the work performed, who performed the
3
work, the applicable rate, and how much time was spent on each task. Counsel spent 1.6
4
hours on the case at a billable rate of $500 per hour. The Court finds the time spent is
5
reasonable given the nature of the case, and the rate is reasonable given counsel’s twenty-
6
two years of experience.
7
reasonable for an attorney with 20+ years of experience).)
8
(See id. at 21 (Laffey Matrix indicating that $500/hr is
The Court, however, declines to award the remaining fees.
The statement
9
indicates that an unidentified research attorney spent 2 hours on the case at a billable rate
10
of $300 per hour. But there is no evidence of the research attorney’s level of experience,
11
and thus the Court is unable to determine whether the rate is reasonable. In addition, the
12
Court declines to grant fees incurred by counsel’s unidentified administrative assistant,
13
who spent 7.6 hours on the case and billed $100 per hour. “Such clerical tasks are not
14
compensable because they are subsumed in firm overhead costs.” J & J Sports Prod.,
15
Inc. v. Corona, No. 1:12-cv-01844-LJO-JLY, 2014 WL 1513426, at *2 (E.D. Cal. April
16
16, 2014) (citing Nadarajah v. Holder, 569 F.3d 906, 921 (9th Cir. 2009)). Moreover, in
17
several instances, counsel and his administrative assistant performed duplicative tasks, as
18
both completed the “initial file review and file preparation,” the “review of the Court’s
19
order granting motion for admission,” the “public records research and review of
20
Mohammad Maleh,” the “review of the clerk’s entry of default,” and several others.
21
(Doc. 19 at 16-18.) The amount of fees is reduced by $1,360.
22
Plaintiff also requests an award of $1,470 in costs, which includes the $400 filing
23
fee, a $35 pro hac vice charge, $387 for service of process, $22.88 for courier charges,
24
and $625 in “investigative fees.” (Doc. 19 at 18-19.) The Court finds the costs are
25
reasonable except for the investigative fees.
26
administrative assistant, is part of firm overhead costs. The amount of costs awarded is
27
reduced by $625.
28
//
-2-
This cost, like the time spent by the
1
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion, (Doc. 19), is GRANTED as modified.
2
Plaintiff is awarded $845 in costs and $800 in attorneys’ fees. The Clerk shall enter
3
judgment accordingly and terminate this action.
4
Dated this 29th day of November, 2016.
5
6
7
8
9
Douglas L. Rayes
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?