Martinez-Bujanda v. Lynch et al

Filing 38

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner's "Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on a Reply to the Respondent's Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. 29 ), the lodged proposed "Motion to Exc eed the 11 Page Limit on an Answer to the Respondent's Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. 30 ), "Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Add or Supplement 10 More Additional Pages" (Doc. 32 ), the lodged p roposed "Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner's Reply to the Response in Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. 33 ), and "Motion for Notice of Lodgment or Supplemental Lodgment of Evidence Support of a Petition fo r Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. 35 );the Clerk of Court shall file the lodgedproposed (Doc. 30 33 , 34 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in Support of Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 36 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 8/31/2016. (REK)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Jesus Andres Martinez-Bujanda,
Petitioner,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-16-00075-PHX-JJT (ESW)

Loretta E Lynch, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15
16

The Court has considered Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to

17

Exceed the 11 Page Limit on a Reply to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Writ of Habeas

18

Corpus” (Doc. 29), the lodged proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an

19

Answer to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc.

20

30), “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Add or Supplement 10 More Additional

21

Pages” (Doc. 32), the lodged proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s

22

Reply to the Response in Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33), “Motion for

23

Notice of Lodgment or Supplemental Lodgment of Evidence Support of a Petition for

24

Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 35), and “Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in Support of

25

Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 36).

26

Petitioner’s multiple requests to exceed the Court’s page limitation on his reply. These

27

motions to exceed the Court’s page limitation will be granted.

28

No responses have been filed to

1

The Court has considered Respondents’ “Response In Opposition To Petitioner’s

2

Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing” (Doc. 37). No further briefing is necessary regarding

3

Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing. The Motion (Doc. 36) will be denied.

4

Should the Court determine that an evidentiary hearing is necessary upon review of the

5

fully briefed Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C.§ 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc.

6

17), an evidentiary hearing will be set on the Court’s own motion.

7

For good cause shown,

8

IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to

9

Exceed the 11 Page Limit on a Reply to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Writ of Habeas

10

Corpus” (Doc. 29), the lodged proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an

11

Answer to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc.

12

30), “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Add or Supplement 10 More Additional

13

Pages” (Doc. 32), the lodged proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s

14

Reply to the Response in Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33), and

15

“Motion for Notice of Lodgment or Supplemental Lodgment of Evidence Support of a

16

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 35).

17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged

18

proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an Answer to the Respondent’s

19

Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 30). The Court has granted

20

that motion above.

21

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged

22

proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s Reply to the Response in

23

Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33). The Court has granted that motion

24

above.

25

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged

26

proposed Petitioner’s Supplemental Reply Brief to Respondent’s Response in Opposition

27

to a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 34).

28

-2-

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in
Support of Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 36).
Dated this 31st day of August, 2016.

4
5
6

Honorable Eileen S. Willett
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-