Mims v. United States of America
Filing
32
ORDER ACCEPTING AND THE ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 - This case is dismissed, as moot, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/13/17. (SLQ)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Tonya Lee Mims,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-16-00585-PHX-JAT
United States of America,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
16
(R&R) of February 9, 2017, recommending that this case be dismissed as moot. No party
17
or movant has filed an objection to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the
18
R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not
19
required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
20
objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th
21
Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the
22
magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not
23
otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219,
24
1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). Therefore,
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) is accepted and
2
adopted. This case is dismissed, as moot, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
3
of dismissal accordingly.
4
Dated this 13th day of April, 2017.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?