Singh v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing without prejudice the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/18/16. (LAD)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
No. CV-16-00755-PHX-SRB (MHB)
Secretary of Department of Homeland
Petitioner, Paramjit Singh, filed his Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
16 Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on May 5, 2016. On July 20, 2016 Respondent filed its Response
17 to Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner filed a Reply on
18 August 12, 2016. On September 2, 2016 Respondent filed a Notice to the Court and
19 Suggestion of Mootness advising the Court that Petitioner had “received the bond hearing
20 that he sought in the petition.”
The Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on September 26,
2016 recommending that Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be
dismissed as moot and without prejudice.
In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that
they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and
Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The
time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and
Recommendation have been filed. The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report
and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge as the order of this Court (Doc. 16).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing without prejudice the Amended
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
Dated this 18th day of October, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?